CSL
Price
$315.95
Change
-$4.85 (-1.51%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
13.2B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OC
Price
$102.68
Change
-$0.40 (-0.39%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.47B
97 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSL vs OC

Header iconCSL vs OC Comparison
Open Charts CSL vs OCBanner chart's image
Carlisle Companies
Price$315.95
Change-$4.85 (-1.51%)
Volume$423.8K
Capitalization13.2B
Owens Corning
Price$102.68
Change-$0.40 (-0.39%)
Volume$9.27K
Capitalization8.47B
CSL vs OC Comparison Chart in %
CSL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSL vs. OC commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSL is a Buy and OC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CSL: $320.80 vs. OC: $103.08)
Brand notoriety: CSL: Not notable vs. OC: Notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSL: 99% vs. OC: 163%
Market capitalization -- CSL: $13.2B vs. OC: $8.44B
CSL [@Building Products] is valued at $13.2B. OC’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $8.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $91.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $10.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the long-term than OC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the short-term than OC.

Price Growth

CSL (@Building Products) experienced а -2.56% price change this week, while OC (@Building Products) price change was -7.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSL is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

OC is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-1.67% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSL($13.2B) has a higher market cap than OC($8.47B). CSL has higher P/E ratio than OC: CSL (18.01) vs OC (15.02). CSL YTD gains are higher at: -12.312 vs. OC (-38.306). OC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.96B vs. CSL (1.28B). CSL has less debt than OC: CSL (1.89B) vs OC (5.98B). OC has higher revenues than CSL: OC (11.7B) vs CSL (5B).
CSLOCCSL / OC
Capitalization13.2B8.47B156%
EBITDA1.28B1.96B65%
Gain YTD-12.312-38.30632%
P/E Ratio18.0115.02120%
Revenue5B11.7B43%
Total Cash68.4MN/A-
Total Debt1.89B5.98B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSL vs OC: Fundamental Ratings
CSL
OC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1259
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3876
SMR RATING
1..100
3081
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8089
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7545
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OC's Valuation (31) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CSL (52) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that OC’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OC (76) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than OC’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's SMR Rating (30) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OC (81) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than OC’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Price Growth Rating (80) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as OC (89) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

OC's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CSL (75) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that OC’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDGI28.430.14
+0.48%
3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF
PKB95.720.33
+0.35%
Invesco Building & Construction ETF
HIDE23.43N/A
N/A
Alpha Architect High Infl And Defltn ETF
XXCH32.70N/A
N/A
Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Bull 2X Shares
IBDX25.57-0.01
-0.04%
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corp ETF

CSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSL has been loosely correlated with OC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSL jumps, then OC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSL
1D Price
Change %
CSL100%
+0.55%
OC - CSL
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
FBIN - CSL
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
AWI - CSL
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
MAS - CSL
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
LPX - CSL
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
More

OC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OC has been closely correlated with FBIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OC jumps, then FBIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OC
1D Price
Change %
OC100%
+0.07%
FBIN - OC
75%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
LII - OC
74%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
TREX - OC
72%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
LPX - OC
71%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
BLDR - OC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
More