CSL
Price
$366.48
Change
-$0.19 (-0.05%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.67B
73 days until earnings call
OC
Price
$141.97
Change
-$1.91 (-1.33%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.03B
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSL vs OC

Header iconCSL vs OC Comparison
Open Charts CSL vs OCBanner chart's image
Carlisle Companies
Price$366.48
Change-$0.19 (-0.05%)
Volume$1.91K
Capitalization15.67B
Owens Corning
Price$141.97
Change-$1.91 (-1.33%)
Volume$11.8K
Capitalization12.03B
CSL vs OC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSL vs. OC commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSL is a Buy and OC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CSL: $366.67 vs. OC: $143.88)
Brand notoriety: CSL: Not notable vs. OC: Notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSL: 113% vs. OC: 90%
Market capitalization -- CSL: $15.67B vs. OC: $12.03B
CSL [@Building Products] is valued at $15.67B. OC’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $12.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $95.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OC is a better buy in the long-term than CSL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OC is a better buy in the short-term than CSL.

Price Growth

CSL (@Building Products) experienced а +4.01% price change this week, while OC (@Building Products) price change was +5.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSL is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

OC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-0.02% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSL($15.7B) has a higher market cap than OC($12B). CSL has higher P/E ratio than OC: CSL (20.52) vs OC (17.61). CSL YTD gains are higher at: -0.065 vs. OC (-14.355). CSL has less debt than OC: CSL (1.89B) vs OC (6B).
CSLOCCSL / OC
Capitalization15.7B12B131%
EBITDA1.28BN/A-
Gain YTD-0.065-14.3550%
P/E Ratio20.5217.61117%
Revenue5BN/A-
Total Cash68.4MN/A-
Total Debt1.89B6B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSL vs OC: Fundamental Ratings
CSL
OC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2740
SMR RATING
1..100
3185
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5922
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OC's Valuation (47) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CSL (71) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that OC’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as OC (40) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's SMR Rating (31) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OC (85) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than OC’s over the last 12 months.

OC's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CSL (62) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that OC’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

OC's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSL (59) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that OC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPYC41.170.41
+1.01%
Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF
SPSK18.430.08
+0.44%
SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF
NULV42.050.09
+0.21%
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
NITE32.050.05
+0.16%
The Nightview ETF
CPII19.19N/A
N/A
American Beacon Ionic Inflation Prot ETF

CSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSL has been loosely correlated with OC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSL jumps, then OC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSL
1D Price
Change %
CSL100%
+3.45%
OC - CSL
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
FBIN - CSL
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
LPX - CSL
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
BLDR - CSL
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
ROCK - CSL
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.21%
More

OC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OC has been closely correlated with FBIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OC jumps, then FBIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OC
1D Price
Change %
OC100%
-2.24%
FBIN - OC
76%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
MAS - OC
71%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
BLDR - OC
70%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
TREX - OC
67%
Closely correlated
-2.73%
LPX - OC
67%
Closely correlated
-1.87%
More