CSL
Price
$323.87
Change
+$4.78 (+1.50%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
13.85B
11 days until earnings call
OC
Price
$126.96
Change
+$0.66 (+0.52%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
10.62B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSL vs OC

Header iconCSL vs OC Comparison
Open Charts CSL vs OCBanner chart's image
Carlisle Companies
Price$323.87
Change+$4.78 (+1.50%)
Volume$429.99K
Capitalization13.85B
Owens Corning
Price$126.96
Change+$0.66 (+0.52%)
Volume$1.75M
Capitalization10.62B
CSL vs OC Comparison Chart in %
CSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSL vs. OC commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSL is a Hold and OC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CSL: $323.87 vs. OC: $126.96)
Brand notoriety: CSL: Not notable vs. OC: Notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSL: 83% vs. OC: 168%
Market capitalization -- CSL: $13.85B vs. OC: $10.62B
CSL [@Building Products] is valued at $13.85B. OC’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $10.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $92.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $10.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CSL and OC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the short-term than OC.

Price Growth

CSL (@Building Products) experienced а -0.02% price change this week, while OC (@Building Products) price change was +0.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

OC is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+0.71% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSL($13.8B) has a higher market cap than OC($10.6B). CSL has higher P/E ratio than OC: CSL (18.13) vs OC (15.54). CSL YTD gains are higher at: -11.472 vs. OC (-24.427). OC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.96B vs. CSL (1.28B). OC has more cash in the bank: 230M vs. CSL (68.4M). CSL has less debt than OC: CSL (1.89B) vs OC (5.98B). OC has higher revenues than CSL: OC (11.7B) vs CSL (5B).
CSLOCCSL / OC
Capitalization13.8B10.6B130%
EBITDA1.28B1.96B65%
Gain YTD-11.472-24.42747%
P/E Ratio18.1315.54117%
Revenue5B11.7B43%
Total Cash68.4M230M30%
Total Debt1.89B5.98B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSL vs OC: Fundamental Ratings
CSL
OC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1454
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3652
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9595
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8646
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
504

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OC's Valuation (37) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CSL (50) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that OC’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as OC (52) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's SMR Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as OC (100) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Price Growth Rating (95) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as OC (95) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

OC's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSL (86) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that OC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SEIE30.38N/A
N/A
SEI Select International Equity ETF
BSCW21.05-0.02
-0.09%
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corp Bd ETF
JRS8.04-0.04
-0.50%
Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund
ZAP30.74-0.16
-0.52%
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF
FTWO40.14-0.76
-1.86%
Strive Natural Resources and SecurityETF

CSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSL has been loosely correlated with OC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSL jumps, then OC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSL
1D Price
Change %
CSL100%
+1.50%
OC - CSL
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
TREX - CSL
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
FBIN - CSL
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
AWI - CSL
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
LII - CSL
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
More

OC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OC has been closely correlated with FBIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OC jumps, then FBIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OC
1D Price
Change %
OC100%
+0.52%
FBIN - OC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
TREX - OC
78%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
LII - OC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
MAS - OC
72%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
BLDR - OC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
More