CSL
Price
$409.59
Change
+$2.62 (+0.64%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
18.83B
10 days until earnings call
OC
Price
$140.04
Change
-$1.65 (-1.16%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
14.51B
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSL vs OC

Header iconCSL vs OC Comparison
Open Charts CSL vs OCBanner chart's image
Carlisle Companies
Price$409.59
Change+$2.62 (+0.64%)
Volume$307.38K
Capitalization18.83B
Owens Corning
Price$140.04
Change-$1.65 (-1.16%)
Volume$763.68K
Capitalization14.51B
CSL vs OC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSL vs. OC commentary
Jul 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSL is a Hold and OC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CSL: $409.59 vs. OC: $140.04)
Brand notoriety: CSL: Not notable vs. OC: Notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSL: 74% vs. OC: 90%
Market capitalization -- CSL: $18.83B vs. OC: $14.51B
CSL [@Building Products] is valued at $18.83B. OC’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $14.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $67.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $12.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OC is a better buy in the long-term than CSL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CSL and OC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CSL (@Building Products) experienced а -0.75% price change this week, while OC (@Building Products) price change was -5.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

OC is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-1.06% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSL($18.8B) has a higher market cap than OC($14.5B). CSL has higher P/E ratio than OC: CSL (27.70) vs OC (12.85). CSL YTD gains are higher at: 11.633 vs. OC (-17.052). OC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.28B vs. CSL (1.21B). OC has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. CSL (577M). CSL has less debt than OC: CSL (2.32B) vs OC (3.27B). OC has higher revenues than CSL: OC (9.68B) vs CSL (4.59B).
CSLOCCSL / OC
Capitalization18.8B14.5B130%
EBITDA1.21B2.28B53%
Gain YTD11.633-17.052-68%
P/E Ratio27.7012.85216%
Revenue4.59B9.68B47%
Total Cash577M1.62B36%
Total Debt2.32B3.27B71%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSL vs OC: Fundamental Ratings
CSL
OC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1682
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2239
SMR RATING
1..100
1983
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4761
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6818
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OC's Valuation (38) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CSL (70) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that OC’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as OC (39) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's SMR Rating (19) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OC (83) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than OC’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as OC (61) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

OC's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSL (68) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that OC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLG6.190.36
+6.17%
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
RSPU73.021.08
+1.50%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Utilts ETF
CRTC34.600.01
+0.04%
Xtrackers US National Crtcl Techs ETF
FMNY25.73-0.02
-0.07%
First Trust New York High Inc Mncpl ETF
JMUB49.09-0.05
-0.10%
JPMorgan Municipal ETF

CSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSL has been closely correlated with OC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSL jumps, then OC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSL
1D Price
Change %
CSL100%
+0.64%
OC - CSL
68%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
FBIN - CSL
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
MAS - CSL
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
WMS - CSL
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
BLDR - CSL
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.92%
More

OC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OC has been closely correlated with FBIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OC jumps, then FBIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OC
1D Price
Change %
OC100%
-1.16%
FBIN - OC
76%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
BLDR - OC
72%
Closely correlated
-2.92%
MAS - OC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
WMS - OC
69%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
CSL - OC
68%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
More