CSL
Price
$355.84
Change
+$33.52 (+10.40%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.87B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAS
Price
$68.05
Change
+$0.65 (+0.96%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.13B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSL vs MAS

Header iconCSL vs MAS Comparison
Open Charts CSL vs MASBanner chart's image
Carlisle Companies
Price$355.84
Change+$33.52 (+10.40%)
Volume$785.79K
Capitalization14.87B
Mas
Price$68.05
Change+$0.65 (+0.96%)
Volume$2.82M
Capitalization14.13B
CSL vs MAS Comparison Chart in %
CSL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSL vs. MAS commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSL is a Hold and MAS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (CSL: $355.84 vs. MAS: $68.05)
Brand notoriety: CSL and MAS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSL: 186% vs. MAS: 121%
Market capitalization -- CSL: $14.87B vs. MAS: $14.13B
CSL [@Building Products] is valued at $14.87B. MAS’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $14.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $96.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $10.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the long-term than MAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the short-term than MAS.

Price Growth

CSL (@Building Products) experienced а +2.81% price change this week, while MAS (@Building Products) price change was +1.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSL is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

MAS is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-0.33% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSL($14.9B) has a higher market cap than MAS($14.1B). CSL has higher P/E ratio than MAS: CSL (20.74) vs MAS (17.40). CSL YTD gains are higher at: 11.249 vs. MAS (7.233). MAS (1.27B) and CSL (1.24B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . CSL has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. MAS (559M). CSL has less debt than MAS: CSL (2.88B) vs MAS (3.17B). MAS has higher revenues than CSL: MAS (7.6B) vs CSL (5.02B).
CSLMASCSL / MAS
Capitalization14.9B14.1B106%
EBITDA1.24B1.27B98%
Gain YTD11.2497.233156%
P/E Ratio20.7417.40119%
Revenue5.02B7.6B66%
Total Cash1.11B559M198%
Total Debt2.88B3.17B91%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSL vs MAS: Fundamental Ratings
CSL
MAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8463
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4360
SMR RATING
1..100
292
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5757
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5069
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSL's Valuation (55) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAS (96) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAS’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as MAS (60) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to MAS’s over the last 12 months.

MAS's SMR Rating (2) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CSL (29) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that MAS’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

MAS's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CSL (57) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that MAS’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as MAS (69) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to MAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLMAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RFV136.531.35
+1.00%
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF
EEMA101.020.18
+0.18%
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
LVDS52.480.06
+0.11%
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Sci Lrg ValETF
PHDG37.83-0.06
-0.17%
Invesco S&P 500® Downside Hedged ETF
FFDI31.56-0.07
-0.22%
Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF

CSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSL has been loosely correlated with OC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSL jumps, then OC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSL
1D Price
Change %
CSL100%
+3.60%
OC - CSL
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
TREX - CSL
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.17%
FBIN - CSL
58%
Loosely correlated
+4.32%
AWI - CSL
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
LPX - CSL
55%
Loosely correlated
+5.20%
More

MAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAS has been closely correlated with FBIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAS jumps, then FBIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAS
1D Price
Change %
MAS100%
+2.22%
FBIN - MAS
87%
Closely correlated
+4.32%
BLDR - MAS
76%
Closely correlated
+4.67%
OC - MAS
72%
Closely correlated
+2.28%
TREX - MAS
69%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
LII - MAS
67%
Closely correlated
+2.67%
More