CSL
Price
$321.18
Change
+$1.46 (+0.46%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
13.42B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LPX
Price
$82.72
Change
+$0.88 (+1.08%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.71B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSL vs LPX

Header iconCSL vs LPX Comparison
Open Charts CSL vs LPXBanner chart's image
Carlisle Companies
Price$321.18
Change+$1.46 (+0.46%)
Volume$491.51K
Capitalization13.42B
Louisiana-Pacific
Price$82.72
Change+$0.88 (+1.08%)
Volume$3.59K
Capitalization5.71B
CSL vs LPX Comparison Chart in %
CSL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LPX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSL vs. LPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSL is a StrongBuy and LPX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CSL: $319.84 vs. LPX: $81.86)
Brand notoriety: CSL and LPX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSL: 30% vs. LPX: 29%
Market capitalization -- CSL: $13.31B vs. LPX: $5.71B
CSL [@Building Products] is valued at $13.31B. LPX’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $5.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $90.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $10.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLPX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LPX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CSL and LPX are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LPX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LPX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the short-term than LPX.

Price Growth

CSL (@Building Products) experienced а +1.11% price change this week, while LPX (@Building Products) price change was +0.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +1.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSL is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

LPX is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+1.35% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSL($13.4B) has a higher market cap than LPX($5.72B). LPX has higher P/E ratio than CSL: LPX (26.56) vs CSL (18.31). CSL YTD gains are higher at: -12.574 vs. LPX (-20.267). CSL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.28B vs. LPX (533M). LPX has more cash in the bank: 333M vs. CSL (68.4M). LPX has less debt than CSL: LPX (378M) vs CSL (1.89B). CSL has higher revenues than LPX: CSL (5B) vs LPX (2.88B).
CSLLPXCSL / LPX
Capitalization13.4B5.72B234%
EBITDA1.28B533M239%
Gain YTD-12.574-20.26762%
P/E Ratio18.3126.5669%
Revenue5B2.88B174%
Total Cash68.4M333M21%
Total Debt1.89B378M501%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSL vs LPX: Fundamental Ratings
CSL
LPX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4239
SMR RATING
1..100
3049
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7979
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7418
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSL's Valuation (45) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LPX (87) in the Forest Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than LPX’s over the last 12 months.

LPX's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Forest Products industry is in the same range as CSL (42) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that LPX’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's SMR Rating (30) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as LPX (49) in the Forest Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to LPX’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Price Growth Rating (79) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as LPX (79) in the Forest Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to LPX’s over the last 12 months.

LPX's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSL (74) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that LPX’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLLPX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LPX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPYQ162.270.51
+0.32%
Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF
BKEM73.810.13
+0.18%
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
RPV101.70-0.41
-0.40%
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF
TURF28.29-0.28
-1.00%
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF
FDIG42.32-1.11
-2.56%
Fidelity Crypto Industry&DgtlPymntsETF

CSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSL has been loosely correlated with OC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSL jumps, then OC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSL
1D Price
Change %
CSL100%
+0.44%
OC - CSL
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
FBIN - CSL
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
AWI - CSL
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
MAS - CSL
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
LPX - CSL
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More

LPX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LPX has been closely correlated with BXC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LPX jumps, then BXC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LPX
1D Price
Change %
LPX100%
-0.24%
BXC - LPX
78%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
OC - LPX
73%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
TREX - LPX
71%
Closely correlated
-1.47%
BLDR - LPX
66%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
MAS - LPX
66%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
More