CSL
Price
$396.18
Change
+$4.21 (+1.07%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.94B
47 days until earnings call
FBIN
Price
$60.81
Change
+$1.76 (+2.98%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.3B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSL vs FBIN

Header iconCSL vs FBIN Comparison
Open Charts CSL vs FBINBanner chart's image
Carlisle Companies
Price$396.18
Change+$4.21 (+1.07%)
Volume$3.23K
Capitalization16.94B
Fortune Brands Innovations
Price$60.81
Change+$1.76 (+2.98%)
Volume$19.97K
Capitalization7.3B
CSL vs FBIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSL vs. FBIN commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSL is a Buy and FBIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CSL: $391.97 vs. FBIN: $59.05)
Brand notoriety: CSL and FBIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSL: 92% vs. FBIN: 103%
Market capitalization -- CSL: $16.94B vs. FBIN: $7.3B
CSL [@Building Products] is valued at $16.94B. FBIN’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $7.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $92.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFBIN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FBIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the long-term than FBIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSL’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSL’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FBIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the short-term than FBIN.

Price Growth

CSL (@Building Products) experienced а +1.46% price change this week, while FBIN (@Building Products) price change was +0.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSL is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

FBIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+2.76% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSL($16.9B) has a higher market cap than FBIN($7.3B). CSL has higher P/E ratio than FBIN: CSL (22.18) vs FBIN (19.19). CSL YTD gains are higher at: 7.142 vs. FBIN (-12.441). CSL has less debt than FBIN: CSL (1.89B) vs FBIN (3B).
CSLFBINCSL / FBIN
Capitalization16.9B7.3B231%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.142-12.441-57%
P/E Ratio22.1819.19116%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.89B3B63%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSL vs FBIN: Fundamental Ratings
CSL
FBIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5656
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26100
SMR RATING
1..100
3051
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5459
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5668
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBIN's Valuation (67) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CSL (68) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that FBIN’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is significantly better than the same rating for FBIN (100) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew significantly faster than FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's SMR Rating (30) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as FBIN (51) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as FBIN (59) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as FBIN (68) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLFBIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSL13.450.26
+1.97%
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF
AFLG37.950.29
+0.77%
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
JHPI22.980.05
+0.22%
JHancock Preferred Income ETF
NVG11.83N/A
N/A
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund
WCME16.15N/A
N/A
First Trust WCM Devpg Wld Eq ETF

CSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSL has been loosely correlated with OC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSL jumps, then OC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSL
1D Price
Change %
CSL100%
+4.41%
OC - CSL
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.94%
TREX - CSL
59%
Loosely correlated
+4.18%
FBIN - CSL
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.32%
AWI - CSL
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
LPX - CSL
56%
Loosely correlated
+4.01%
More

FBIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBIN has been closely correlated with MAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBIN jumps, then MAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBIN
1D Price
Change %
FBIN100%
+3.32%
MAS - FBIN
87%
Closely correlated
+2.28%
OC - FBIN
78%
Closely correlated
+2.94%
BLDR - FBIN
77%
Closely correlated
+5.09%
TREX - FBIN
74%
Closely correlated
+4.18%
NX - FBIN
67%
Closely correlated
+4.08%
More