CSIQ vs FTCI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSIQ is a Hold and FTCI is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSIQ’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTCI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSIQ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- FTCI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
| CSIQ | FTCI | CSIQ / FTCI | |
| Capitalization | 1.27B | 67.7M | 1,882% |
| EBITDA | 637M | -49M | -1,300% |
| Gain YTD | -13.579 | -50.998 | 27% |
| P/E Ratio | 3.95 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 7.88B | 127M | 6,207% |
| Total Cash | 1.92B | 25.2M | 7,623% |
| Total Debt | 4.54B | 1.86M | 243,294% |
CSIQ | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CSIQ | FTCI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 78% | 23 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
CSIQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSIQ has been loosely correlated with JKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSIQ jumps, then JKS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSIQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSIQ | 100% | -2.34% | ||
| JKS - CSIQ | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| RUN - CSIQ | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| ENPH - CSIQ | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.93% | ||
| NOVA - CSIQ | 55% Loosely correlated | -16.50% | ||
| FCEL - CSIQ | 54% Loosely correlated | +3.63% | ||
More | ||||
FTCI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTCI has been loosely correlated with GWH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTCI jumps, then GWH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTCI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTCI | 100% | -1.46% | ||
| GWH - FTCI | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| SHLS - FTCI | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| ARRY - FTCI | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| CSIQ - FTCI | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.34% | ||
| RUN - FTCI | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||