Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHZX vs RMLPX
CSHZX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHZX vs. RMLPX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHZX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. CSHZX (1.02B). CSHZX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: CSHZX (6.17) vs RMLPX (5.02). CSHZX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: CSHZX (15 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). CSHZX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). CSHZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). RMLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHZX: RMLPX (2500) vs CSHZX (1000000). CSHZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.68 vs. RMLPX (3.11). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 267.58 vs. CSHZX (214.47).
| CSHZX | RMLPX | CSHZX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.10 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.10 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.945 | 4.196 | -23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 1.16B | 88% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.17 | 5.02 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.68 | 3.11 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.15 | 59.74 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 214.47 | 267.58 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement