Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHZX vs RMLPX
CSHZX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHZX vs. RMLPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHZX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. CSHZX (1.12B). CSHZX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: CSHZX (5.94) vs RMLPX (4.76). CSHZX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: CSHZX (15 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). CSHZX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). CSHZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMLPX (12.00). RMLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHZX: RMLPX (2500) vs CSHZX (1000000). RMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.50 vs. CSHZX (1.37). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 212.93 vs. CSHZX (175.88).
| CSHZX | RMLPX | CSHZX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.10 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.10 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.019 | 11.188 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 1.32B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.94 | 4.76 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.37 | 15.50 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.34 | 73.14 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 175.88 | 212.93 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 138.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement