Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHZX vs RMLPX
CSHZX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHZX vs. RMLPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHZX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. CSHZX (1.06B). CSHZX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: CSHZX (6.25) vs RMLPX (4.94). CSHZX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: CSHZX (15 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). CSHZX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). CSHZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). RMLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHZX: RMLPX (2500) vs CSHZX (1000000). RMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.35 vs. CSHZX (-0.59). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 214.50 vs. CSHZX (186.23).
| CSHZX | RMLPX | CSHZX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.10 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.10 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.142 | 11.223 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 1.19B | 89% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.25 | 4.94 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.59 | 2.35 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.55 | 58.21 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 186.23 | 214.50 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement