Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHZX vs MLPFX
CSHZX vs MLPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHZX vs. MLPFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHZX is a Hold and MLPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPFX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. CSHZX (1.02B). CSHZX (6.17) and MLPFX (6.03) have matching dividends . CSHZX was incepted earlier than MLPFX: CSHZX (15 years) vs MLPFX (16 years). MLPFX (10.29) is less costly to investors than CSHZX (1.25). CSHZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MLPFX (20.00). MLPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHZX: MLPFX (1000) vs CSHZX (1000000). MLPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.86 vs. CSHZX (5.68). MLPFX return over 5 years is better than : 238.16 vs. CSHZX (214.47).
| CSHZX | MLPFX | CSHZX / MLPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 10.29 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 10.29 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.945 | 1.594 | -59% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 1.94B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.17 | 6.03 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.68 | 7.86 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.15 | 69.41 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 214.47 | 238.16 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.15 | 88.38 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement