Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHZX vs MLPFX
CSHZX vs MLPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHZX vs. MLPFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHZX is a Hold and MLPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPFX has more cash in the bank: 2.18B vs. CSHZX (1.12B). CSHZX (5.94) and MLPFX (5.72) have matching dividends . CSHZX was incepted earlier than MLPFX: CSHZX (15 years) vs MLPFX (16 years). MLPFX (10.29) is less costly to investors than CSHZX (1.25). CSHZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MLPFX (20.00). MLPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHZX: MLPFX (1000) vs CSHZX (1000000). MLPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.76 vs. CSHZX (1.37). MLPFX return over 5 years is better than : 190.10 vs. CSHZX (175.88).
| CSHZX | MLPFX | CSHZX / MLPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 10.29 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 10.29 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.019 | 8.773 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 2.18B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.94 | 5.72 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.37 | 8.76 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.34 | 77.42 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 175.88 | 190.10 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 138.21 | 205.26 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement