CSHX
Price
$73.75
Change
+$3.76 (+5.37%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
288.18M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NIC
Price
$150.32
Change
+$0.66 (+0.44%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.22B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSHX vs NIC

Header iconCSHX vs NIC Comparison
Open Charts CSHX vs NICBanner chart's image
Cashmere Valley Bank
Price$73.75
Change+$3.76 (+5.37%)
Volume$2.87K
Capitalization288.18M
Nicolet Bankshares
Price$150.32
Change+$0.66 (+0.44%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.22B
CSHX vs NIC Comparison Chart in %
CSHX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NIC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSHX vs. NIC commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHX is a Hold and NIC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (CSHX: $73.75 vs. NIC: $149.66)
Brand notoriety: CSHX and NIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSHX: 140% vs. NIC: 83%
Market capitalization -- CSHX: $288.18M vs. NIC: $2.22B
CSHX [@Regional Banks] is valued at $288.18M. NIC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSHX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CSHX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSHX is a better buy in the long-term than NIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSHX’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSHX’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NIC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NIC is a better buy in the short-term than CSHX.

Price Growth

CSHX (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.31% price change this week, while NIC (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

NIC is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NIC($2.22B) has a higher market cap than CSHX($288M). NIC has higher P/E ratio than CSHX: NIC (15.30) vs CSHX (9.97). NIC YTD gains are higher at: 23.380 vs. CSHX (0.977). NIC has more cash in the bank: 94.4M vs. CSHX (26.2M). CSHX has less debt than NIC: CSHX (84M) vs NIC (135M). NIC has higher revenues than CSHX: NIC (379M) vs CSHX (81M).
CSHXNICCSHX / NIC
Capitalization288M2.22B13%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.97723.3804%
P/E Ratio9.9715.3065%
Revenue81M379M21%
Total Cash26.2M94.4M28%
Total Debt84M135M62%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSHX vs NIC: Fundamental Ratings
CSHX
NIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6219
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4925
SMR RATING
1..100
4321
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3241
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSHX's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as NIC (71) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CSHX (49) in the null industry. This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's SMR Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CSHX (43) in the null industry. This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CSHX (51) in the null industry. This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

CSHX's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as NIC (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSHXNIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSHX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NIC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCGEX12.840.03
+0.23%
Calamos Global Equity C
SBMLX20.18-0.13
-0.64%
ClearBridge Mid Cap C
PWGIX27.27-0.35
-1.27%
Impax US Sustainable Economy Instl
FGSIX63.78-1.15
-1.77%
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth IS
MGKAX11.74-0.25
-2.09%
Morgan Stanley Global Permanence A

CSHX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSHX has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSHX jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSHX
1D Price
Change %
CSHX100%
-0.07%
GPFOF - CSHX
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
NIC - CSHX
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
RNST - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
MYFW - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBNC - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
More

NIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NIC has been closely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NIC jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIC
1D Price
Change %
NIC100%
+0.75%
EFSC - NIC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
STBA - NIC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
CTBI - NIC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
UVSP - NIC
84%
Closely correlated
+2.69%
TCBK - NIC
84%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
More