CSHX
Price
$68.98
Change
+$0.04 (+0.06%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
269.07M
NIC
Price
$136.52
Change
+$0.56 (+0.41%)
Updated
Sep 8, 12:48 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.02B
50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSHX vs NIC

Header iconCSHX vs NIC Comparison
Open Charts CSHX vs NICBanner chart's image
Cashmere Valley Bank
Price$68.98
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
Volume$440
Capitalization269.07M
Nicolet Bankshares
Price$136.52
Change+$0.56 (+0.41%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.02B
CSHX vs NIC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSHX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSHX vs. NIC commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHX is a Hold and NIC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CSHX: $68.98 vs. NIC: $135.96)
Brand notoriety: CSHX and NIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSHX: 23% vs. NIC: 50%
Market capitalization -- CSHX: $269.07M vs. NIC: $2.02B
CSHX [@Regional Banks] is valued at $269.07M. NIC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSHX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CSHX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSHX is a better buy in the long-term than NIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSHX’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSHX’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NIC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NIC is a better buy in the short-term than CSHX.

Price Growth

CSHX (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.03% price change this week, while NIC (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

NIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.14% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NIC($2.02B) has a higher market cap than CSHX($269M). NIC has higher P/E ratio than CSHX: NIC (15.57) vs CSHX (9.32). NIC YTD gains are higher at: 30.552 vs. CSHX (21.284). NIC has more cash in the bank: 130M vs. CSHX (33.9M). CSHX has less debt than NIC: CSHX (84M) vs NIC (134M).
CSHXNICCSHX / NIC
Capitalization269M2.02B13%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.28430.55270%
P/E Ratio9.3215.5760%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash33.9M130M26%
Total Debt84M134M63%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSHX vs NIC: Fundamental Ratings
CSHX
NIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3924
SMR RATING
1..100
4321
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2635
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSHX's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as NIC (72) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CSHX (39) in the null industry. This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's SMR Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CSHX (43) in the null industry. This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CSHX (51) in the null industry. This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

CSHX's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as NIC (35) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSHXNIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSHX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GITAX31.690.16
+0.51%
Goldman Sachs Technology Opps A
CAMUX22.790.06
+0.26%
Cambiar SMID Institutional
CGCIX14.150.01
+0.07%
Calamos Global Opportunities I
MVCGX29.01N/A
N/A
MFS Mid Cap Value R1
INDZX18.12-0.01
-0.06%
Columbia Intrinsic Value A

CSHX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSHX and NIC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSHX and NIC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSHX
1D Price
Change %
CSHX100%
N/A
NIC - CSHX
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
RNST - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
BRKL - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBNC - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
FFBC - CSHX
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
More

NIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NIC has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NIC jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIC
1D Price
Change %
NIC100%
-1.18%
STBA - NIC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
EFSC - NIC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.83%
CTBI - NIC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
TCBK - NIC
85%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
UVSP - NIC
85%
Closely correlated
-2.32%
More