CSHX
Price
$66.92
Change
-$0.07 (-0.10%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
171.09M
HBNC
Price
$16.77
Change
-$0.24 (-1.41%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
548.3M
58 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CSHX vs HBNC

Header iconCSHX vs HBNC Comparison
Open Charts CSHX vs HBNCBanner chart's image
Cashmere Valley Bank
Price$66.92
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
Volume$3.66K
Capitalization171.09M
Horizon Ban
Price$16.77
Change-$0.24 (-1.41%)
Volume$207.13K
Capitalization548.3M
CSHX vs HBNC Comparison Chart
Loading...
HBNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSHX vs. HBNC commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHX is a Hold and HBNC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CSHX: $66.92 vs. HBNC: $16.77)
Brand notoriety: CSHX and HBNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSHX: 253% vs. HBNC: 128%
Market capitalization -- CSHX: $171.09M vs. HBNC: $548.3M
CSHX [@Regional Banks] is valued at $171.09M. HBNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $548.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSHX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHBNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSHX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HBNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSHX is a better buy in the long-term than HBNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBNC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HBNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CSHX (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.65% price change this week, while HBNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

HBNC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.87% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBNC($548M) has a higher market cap than CSHX($171M). HBNC has higher P/E ratio than CSHX: HBNC (19.42) vs CSHX (6.06). CSHX YTD gains are higher at: 16.052 vs. HBNC (5.160). CSHX has less debt than HBNC: CSHX (14.2M) vs HBNC (900M). HBNC has higher revenues than CSHX: HBNC (183M) vs CSHX (77.2M).
CSHXHBNCCSHX / HBNC
Capitalization171M548M31%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.0525.160311%
P/E Ratio6.0619.4231%
Revenue77.2M183M42%
Total Cash24MN/A-
Total Debt14.2M900M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSHX vs HBNC: Fundamental Ratings
CSHX
HBNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1764
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5877
SMR RATING
1..100
3725
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2637
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSHX's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as HBNC (64) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

CSHX's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as HBNC (77) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

HBNC's SMR Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CSHX (37) in the null industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

CSHX's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as HBNC (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

CSHX's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as HBNC (37) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HBNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96273.920000-303.835940
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

CSHX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSHX and NIC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSHX and NIC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSHX
1D Price
Change %
CSHX100%
-0.10%
NIC - CSHX
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
RNST - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
BHLB - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
BRKL - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
HBNC - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
More

HBNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBNC has been closely correlated with HFWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBNC jumps, then HFWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBNC
1D Price
Change %
HBNC100%
-1.41%
HFWA - HBNC
89%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
UBSI - HBNC
88%
Closely correlated
-3.37%
NWBI - HBNC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
THFF - HBNC
86%
Closely correlated
-3.31%
FMBH - HBNC
86%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
More