CSHX
Price
$67.44
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
171.09M
HACBY
Price
$13.85
Change
-$3.08 (-18.19%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.57B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSHX vs HACBY

Header iconCSHX vs HACBY Comparison
Open Charts CSHX vs HACBYBanner chart's image
Cashmere Valley Bank
Price$67.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.62K
Capitalization171.09M
Hachijuni Bank Ltd. (THE)
Price$13.85
Change-$3.08 (-18.19%)
Volume$149
Capitalization2.57B
CSHX vs HACBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSHX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HACBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSHX vs. HACBY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHX is a Hold and HACBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CSHX: $67.44 vs. HACBY: $13.85)
Brand notoriety: CSHX and HACBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSHX: 69% vs. HACBY: 32%
Market capitalization -- CSHX: $171.09M vs. HACBY: $2.57B
CSHX [@Regional Banks] is valued at $171.09M. HACBY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSHX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHACBY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CSHX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HACBY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSHX is a better buy in the long-term than HACBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSHX’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HACBY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSHX’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HACBY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HACBY is a better buy in the short-term than CSHX.

Price Growth

CSHX (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.09% price change this week, while HACBY (@Regional Banks) price change was -18.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

HACBY is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HACBY($2.57B) has a higher market cap than CSHX($171M). HACBY has higher P/E ratio than CSHX: HACBY (14.22) vs CSHX (6.06). CSHX YTD gains are higher at: 16.954 vs. HACBY (15.609). CSHX has less debt than HACBY: CSHX (14.2M) vs HACBY (2.23T). HACBY has higher revenues than CSHX: HACBY (165B) vs CSHX (77.2M).
CSHXHACBYCSHX / HACBY
Capitalization171M2.57B7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.95415.609109%
P/E Ratio6.0614.2243%
Revenue77.2M165B0%
Total Cash24MN/A-
Total Debt14.2M2.23T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSHX vs HACBY: Fundamental Ratings
CSHX
HACBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4012
SMR RATING
1..100
361
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4862
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2584
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HACBY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSHX (55). This means that HACBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

HACBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CSHX (40). This means that HACBY’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

HACBY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSHX (36). This means that HACBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

CSHX's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as HACBY (62). This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to HACBY’s over the last 12 months.

CSHX's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HACBY (84). This means that CSHX’s stock grew somewhat faster than HACBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSHXHACBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
27%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
23%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSHX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HACBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSCPX12.260.12
+0.99%
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
BITSX28.670.24
+0.84%
iShares Total US Stock Market Idx Instl
CWGFX71.400.46
+0.65%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc F1
LICOX17.700.02
+0.11%
Lord Abbett International Equity F3
DLDYX44.81-0.10
-0.22%
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Y

CSHX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSHX and NIC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSHX and NIC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSHX
1D Price
Change %
CSHX100%
N/A
NIC - CSHX
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
RNST - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
BHLB - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
BRKL - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
HBNC - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
More

HACBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HACBY and ADBKF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HACBY and ADBKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HACBY
1D Price
Change %
HACBY100%
N/A
ADBKF - HACBY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SYANY - HACBY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NBGIF - HACBY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
FINN - HACBY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
CSHX - HACBY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More