CSHX
Price
$69.51
Change
+$0.76 (+1.11%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
271.14M
HACBY
Price
$20.40
Change
+$0.20 (+0.99%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.83B
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSHX vs HACBY

Header iconCSHX vs HACBY Comparison
Open Charts CSHX vs HACBYBanner chart's image
Cashmere Valley Bank
Price$69.51
Change+$0.76 (+1.11%)
Volume$3.91K
Capitalization271.14M
Hachijuni Bank Ltd. (THE)
Price$20.40
Change+$0.20 (+0.99%)
Volume$4.01K
Capitalization4.83B
CSHX vs HACBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSHX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HACBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSHX vs. HACBY commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHX is a Buy and HACBY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CSHX: $69.51 vs. HACBY: $20.40)
Brand notoriety: CSHX and HACBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSHX: 204% vs. HACBY: 239%
Market capitalization -- CSHX: $271.14M vs. HACBY: $4.83B
CSHX [@Regional Banks] is valued at $271.14M. HACBY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSHX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHACBY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CSHX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HACBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSHX is a better buy in the long-term than HACBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSHX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HACBY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSHX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HACBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HACBY is a better buy in the short-term than CSHX.

Price Growth

CSHX (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.76% price change this week, while HACBY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

HACBY is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HACBY($4.83B) has a higher market cap than CSHX($271M). HACBY has higher P/E ratio than CSHX: HACBY (15.00) vs CSHX (9.39). HACBY YTD gains are higher at: 70.284 vs. CSHX (22.216).
CSHXHACBYCSHX / HACBY
Capitalization271M4.83B6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.21670.28432%
P/E Ratio9.3915.0063%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash33.9MN/A-
Total Debt84MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSHX vs HACBY: Fundamental Ratings
CSHX
HACBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
405
SMR RATING
1..100
431
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2784
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSHX's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as HACBY (49). This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to HACBY’s over the last 12 months.

HACBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSHX (40). This means that HACBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

HACBY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSHX (43). This means that HACBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

HACBY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CSHX (52). This means that HACBY’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

CSHX's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HACBY (84). This means that CSHX’s stock grew somewhat faster than HACBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSHXHACBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
17%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
44%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSHX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HACBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AATIX19.620.26
+1.34%
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap I
AMADX39.500.38
+0.97%
American Century Discplnd Cor Val A
PSTAX21.390.10
+0.47%
Virtus KAR Capital Growth A
NLSCX18.780.04
+0.21%
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
FSEKX14.36N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable U.S. Eq A

CSHX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSHX and NIC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSHX and NIC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSHX
1D Price
Change %
CSHX100%
+1.11%
NIC - CSHX
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
RNST - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
HBNC - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
FFBC - CSHX
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
CNOB - CSHX
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
More

HACBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HACBY and ADBKF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HACBY and ADBKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HACBY
1D Price
Change %
HACBY100%
N/A
ADBKF - HACBY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SYANY - HACBY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NBGIF - HACBY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FINN - HACBY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSHX - HACBY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
More