CSHX
Price
$68.98
Change
+$0.04 (+0.06%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
269.07M
FFBC
Price
$26.21
Change
-$0.17 (-0.64%)
Updated
Sep 8, 12:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.5B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSHX vs FFBC

Header iconCSHX vs FFBC Comparison
Open Charts CSHX vs FFBCBanner chart's image
Cashmere Valley Bank
Price$68.98
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
Volume$440
Capitalization269.07M
First Financial Ban
Price$26.21
Change-$0.17 (-0.64%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.5B
CSHX vs FFBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSHX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSHX vs. FFBC commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHX is a Hold and FFBC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CSHX: $68.98 vs. FFBC: $26.38)
Brand notoriety: CSHX and FFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSHX: 23% vs. FFBC: 76%
Market capitalization -- CSHX: $269.07M vs. FFBC: $2.5B
CSHX [@Regional Banks] is valued at $269.07M. FFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSHX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFFBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CSHX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CSHX and FFBC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSHX’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFBC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSHX’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FFBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the short-term than CSHX.

Price Growth

CSHX (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.03% price change this week, while FFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.14% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.5B) has a higher market cap than CSHX($269M). FFBC has higher P/E ratio than CSHX: FFBC (10.55) vs CSHX (9.32). CSHX YTD gains are higher at: 21.284 vs. FFBC (0.953). FFBC has more cash in the bank: 210M vs. CSHX (33.9M). CSHX has less debt than FFBC: CSHX (84M) vs FFBC (1.03B).
CSHXFFBCCSHX / FFBC
Capitalization269M2.5B11%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.2840.9532,233%
P/E Ratio9.3210.5588%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash33.9M210M16%
Total Debt84M1.03B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSHX vs FFBC: Fundamental Ratings
CSHX
FFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3924
SMR RATING
1..100
4315
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2651
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSHX's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as FFBC (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CSHX (39) in the null industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CSHX (43) in the null industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CSHX (51) in the null industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

CSHX's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as FFBC (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSHXFFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSHX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PDEQX20.000.25
+1.27%
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Eq OppsR6
NWHTX34.130.14
+0.41%
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci R6
CHUCX26.770.07
+0.26%
Alger Global Equity C
ACIPX16.860.04
+0.24%
American Century Mid Cap Value G
MXGSX12.85-0.29
-2.21%
Empower Large Cap Growth Instl

CSHX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSHX and NIC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSHX and NIC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSHX
1D Price
Change %
CSHX100%
N/A
NIC - CSHX
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
RNST - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
BRKL - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBNC - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
FFBC - CSHX
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
More

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with EBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then EBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
-1.20%
EBC - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
TCBK - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
UBSI - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
FNB - FFBC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
BANR - FFBC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
More