Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs VLPCX
CSHNX vs VLPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. VLPCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and VLPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. VLPCX (44.7M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than VLPCX: CSHNX (6.67) vs VLPCX (1.85). CSHNX was incepted earlier than VLPCX: CSHNX (11 years) vs VLPCX (10 years). VLPCX (2.51) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). VLPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX (2500) and VLPCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.44 vs. VLPCX (4.84). VLPCX return over 5 years is better than : 236.85 vs. CSHNX (210.02).
| CSHNX | VLPCX | CSHNX / VLPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.15 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.51 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.107 | -1.371 | 81% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 44.7M | 2,280% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.67 | 1.85 | 361% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 4.84 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.10 | 55.70 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 210.02 | 236.85 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.83 | 99.94 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement