Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs VLPCX
CSHNX vs VLPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. VLPCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and VLPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. VLPCX (48.5M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than VLPCX: CSHNX (6.61) vs VLPCX (1.91). CSHNX was incepted earlier than VLPCX: CSHNX (11 years) vs VLPCX (10 years). VLPCX (2.51) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). VLPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX (2500) and VLPCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.82 vs. VLPCX (13.68). VLPCX return over 5 years is better than : 197.17 vs. CSHNX (171.90).
| CSHNX | VLPCX | CSHNX / VLPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.15 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.51 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.990 | -1.189 | -167% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 48.5M | 2,235% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.61 | 1.91 | 346% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.82 | 13.68 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 49.02 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.90 | 197.17 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement