Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs VLPCX
CSHNX vs VLPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. VLPCX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and VLPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. VLPCX (41.4M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than VLPCX: CSHNX (6.84) vs VLPCX (1.28). CSHNX was incepted earlier than VLPCX: CSHNX (12 years) vs VLPCX (10 years). VLPCX (2.51) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). VLPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX (2500) and VLPCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.76 vs. VLPCX (-7.57). VLPCX (145.95) and CSHNX (144.24) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | VLPCX | CSHNX / VLPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.15 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.51 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.621 | 1.284 | 126% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 41.4M | 2,553% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.84 | 1.28 | 532% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.76 | -7.57 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.13 | 43.55 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 144.24 | 145.95 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.70 | 182.87 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement