Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs TMLAX
CSHNX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. TMLAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. TMLAX (127M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than TMLAX: CSHNX (6.84) vs TMLAX (4.08). CSHNX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: CSHNX (12 years) vs TMLAX (13 years). TMLAX (1.56) and CSHNX (1.49) have similar cost to investors . TMLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). TMLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). TMLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: TMLAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). TMLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.06 vs. CSHNX (-6.76). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 144.24 vs. TMLAX (76.29).
| CSHNX | TMLAX | CSHNX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.56 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.56 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.621 | 1.714 | 95% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 127M | 832% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.84 | 4.08 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.76 | -0.06 | 10,747% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.13 | 46.83 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 144.24 | 76.29 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.70 | 118.85 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement