Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs TMLAX
CSHNX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. TMLAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and TMLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. TMLAX (145M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than TMLAX: CSHNX (6.79) vs TMLAX (2.38). CSHNX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs TMLAX (12 years). TMLAX (1.56) and CSHNX (1.49) have similar cost to investors . TMLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). TMLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). TMLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: TMLAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX (26.90) and TMLAX (26.73) have marching annual gain over last year. CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 180.78 vs. TMLAX (116.31).
| CSHNX | TMLAX | CSHNX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.56 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.56 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.662 | 3.066 | 119% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 145M | 764% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.79 | 2.38 | 286% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.90 | 26.73 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.49 | 43.18 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 180.78 | 116.31 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.87 | 13.12 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement