Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs TMLAX
CSHNX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. TMLAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. TMLAX (122M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than TMLAX: CSHNX (6.67) vs TMLAX (3.89). CSHNX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs TMLAX (12 years). TMLAX (1.56) and CSHNX (1.49) have similar cost to investors . TMLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). TMLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). TMLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: TMLAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). TMLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.35 vs. CSHNX (5.44). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 210.02 vs. TMLAX (110.56).
| CSHNX | TMLAX | CSHNX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.56 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.56 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.107 | 0.591 | -187% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 122M | 835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.67 | 3.89 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 7.35 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.10 | 46.16 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 210.02 | 110.56 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.83 | 39.70 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement