Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs TMLAX
CSHNX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. TMLAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. TMLAX (137M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than TMLAX: CSHNX (6.43) vs TMLAX (3.80). CSHNX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: CSHNX (12 years) vs TMLAX (13 years). TMLAX (1.56) and CSHNX (1.49) have similar cost to investors . TMLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). TMLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). TMLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: TMLAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). TMLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.57 vs. CSHNX (0.69). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 171.13 vs. TMLAX (91.98).
| CSHNX | TMLAX | CSHNX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.56 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.56 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.944 | 8.229 | 97% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 137M | 813% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.43 | 3.80 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.69 | 6.57 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.38 | 58.72 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.13 | 91.98 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.16 | 120.84 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement