Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs TMCLX
CSHNX vs TMCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. TMCLX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and TMCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. TMCLX (130M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than TMCLX: CSHNX (6.64) vs TMCLX (2.46). CSHNX was incepted earlier than TMCLX: CSHNX (11 years) vs TMCLX (12 years). TMCLX (2.35) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). TMCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). TMCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: TMCLX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.86 vs. TMCLX (13.50). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 203.25 vs. TMCLX (109.18).
| CSHNX | TMCLX | CSHNX / TMCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.35 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.35 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.464 | 1.248 | 197% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 130M | 840% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.64 | 2.46 | 270% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.86 | 13.50 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.77 | 35.14 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 203.25 | 109.18 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.70 | 29.30 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement