Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs TMCLX
CSHNX vs TMCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. TMCLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and TMCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. TMCLX (138M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than TMCLX: CSHNX (6.43) vs TMCLX (3.01). CSHNX was incepted earlier than TMCLX: CSHNX (12 years) vs TMCLX (13 years). TMCLX (2.35) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). TMCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). TMCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: TMCLX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). TMCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.69 vs. CSHNX (0.69). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 171.13 vs. TMCLX (82.95).
| CSHNX | TMCLX | CSHNX / TMCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.35 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.35 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.944 | 6.057 | 131% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 138M | 807% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.43 | 3.01 | 214% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.69 | 4.69 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.38 | 51.93 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.13 | 82.95 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.16 | 107.03 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers