Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs TMCLX
CSHNX vs TMCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. TMCLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and TMCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. TMCLX (125M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than TMCLX: CSHNX (6.76) vs TMCLX (3.05). CSHNX was incepted earlier than TMCLX: CSHNX (11 years) vs TMCLX (13 years). TMCLX (2.35) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). TMCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). TMCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: TMCLX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). TMCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.37 vs. CSHNX (-0.80). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 182.82 vs. TMCLX (89.11).
| CSHNX | TMCLX | CSHNX / TMCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.35 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.35 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.917 | 3.915 | 100% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 125M | 847% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.76 | 3.05 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.80 | -0.37 | 215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.39 | 37.93 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 182.82 | 89.11 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.55 | 76.69 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement