Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs SMRPX
CSHNX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMRPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. CSHNX (1.11B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: CSHNX (6.43) vs SMRPX (4.22). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: CSHNX (12 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: CSHNX (2500) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. CSHNX (0.69). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 171.13 vs. SMRPX (135.35).
| CSHNX | SMRPX | CSHNX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.02 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.05 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.944 | 8.317 | 96% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 1.31B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.43 | 4.22 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.69 | 7.66 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.38 | 70.88 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.13 | 135.35 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.16 | 213.70 | 61% |