Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs SMRPX
CSHNX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMRPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. CSHNX (1.06B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: CSHNX (6.76) vs SMRPX (4.50). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: CSHNX (2500) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.20 vs. CSHNX (-0.80). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 182.82 vs. SMRPX (143.30).
| CSHNX | SMRPX | CSHNX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.02 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.05 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.917 | 5.043 | 78% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 1.26B | 84% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.76 | 4.50 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.80 | 1.20 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.39 | 55.24 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 182.82 | 143.30 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement