Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs SMRPX
CSHNX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMRPX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. CSHNX (1.08B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: CSHNX (6.61) vs SMRPX (4.44). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: CSHNX (2500) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.73 vs. CSHNX (16.82). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 171.90 vs. SMRPX (150.50).
| CSHNX | SMRPX | CSHNX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.02 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.05 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.990 | 4.439 | 45% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 1.28B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.61 | 4.44 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.82 | 17.73 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 58.23 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.90 | 150.50 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement