Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs SMLPX
CSHNX vs SMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMLPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and SMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. CSHNX (1.11B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMLPX: CSHNX (6.43) vs SMLPX (4.14). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMLPX: CSHNX (12 years) vs SMLPX (13 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than SMLPX (1.12). SMLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMLPX: CSHNX (2500) vs SMLPX (100000). SMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.59 vs. CSHNX (0.69). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 171.13 vs. SMLPX (134.83).
| CSHNX | SMLPX | CSHNX / SMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.09 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.12 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.944 | 8.317 | 96% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 1.31B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.43 | 4.14 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.69 | 7.59 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.38 | 70.48 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.13 | 134.83 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.16 | 211.41 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement