Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs SMLPX
CSHNX vs SMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMLPX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and SMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. CSHNX (1.02B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMLPX: CSHNX (6.67) vs SMLPX (4.35). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMLPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs SMLPX (13 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than SMLPX (1.12). SMLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMLPX: CSHNX (2500) vs SMLPX (100000). SMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.74 vs. CSHNX (5.44). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 210.02 vs. SMLPX (173.66).
| CSHNX | SMLPX | CSHNX / SMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.09 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.12 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.107 | 1.447 | -77% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 1.22B | 84% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.67 | 4.35 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 6.74 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.10 | 63.20 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 210.02 | 173.66 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.83 | 73.28 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement