Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs SMFPX
CSHNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. CSHNX (1.11B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHNX (6.43) vs SMFPX (3.19). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHNX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. CSHNX (0.69). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 171.13 vs. SMFPX (123.81).
| CSHNX | SMFPX | CSHNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.12 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.15 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.944 | 8.213 | 97% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 1.29B | 87% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.43 | 3.19 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.69 | 6.78 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.38 | 66.05 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.13 | 123.81 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.16 | 182.43 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement