Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs SMFPX
CSHNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Dec 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. CSHNX (1.04B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHNX (6.76) vs SMFPX (3.39). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.29 vs. CSHNX (3.01). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 180.60 vs. SMFPX (122.39).
| CSHNX | SMFPX | CSHNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.12 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.15 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.436 | 2.787 | 87% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 1.23B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.76 | 3.39 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.01 | 3.29 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.73 | 57.48 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 180.60 | 122.39 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.61 | 131.49 | 68% |