Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs SMFPX
CSHNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. CSHNX (1.06B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHNX (6.76) vs SMFPX (3.39). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.09 vs. CSHNX (-1.32). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 172.19 vs. SMFPX (123.42).
| CSHNX | SMFPX | CSHNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.12 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.15 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.547 | 4.184 | 85% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 1.25B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.76 | 3.39 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.32 | 0.09 | -1,401% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.82 | 50.80 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 172.19 | 123.42 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.85 | 124.14 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement