Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs SMFPX
CSHNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. CSHNX (1.04B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHNX (7.05) vs SMFPX (3.55). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.38 vs. CSHNX (1.65). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 209.37 vs. SMFPX (158.15).
| CSHNX | SMFPX | CSHNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.12 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.15 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.974 | 3.286 | 60% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 1.24B | 84% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 3.55 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.65 | 3.38 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.69 | 51.57 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 209.37 | 158.15 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.71 | 93.28 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement