Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs SMAPX
CSHNX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMAPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and SMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMAPX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. CSHNX (1.11B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: CSHNX (6.43) vs SMAPX (3.88). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: CSHNX (12 years) vs SMAPX (13 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than SMAPX (1.40). SMAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX initial investment is less costly to investors than SMAPX (4%) vs SMAPX (4%). SMAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: SMAPX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). SMAPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.33 vs. CSHNX (0.69). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 171.13 vs. SMAPX (131.95).
| CSHNX | SMAPX | CSHNX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.37 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.40 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.944 | 8.269 | 96% |
| Front Load | 5% | 4% | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 1.31B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.43 | 3.88 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.69 | 7.33 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.38 | 69.16 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.13 | 131.95 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.16 | 204.67 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement