Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs RMLPX
CSHNX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. RMLPX commentary
Feb 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. CSHNX (1.09B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: CSHNX (6.43) vs RMLPX (4.76). CSHNX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: CSHNX (12 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMLPX (12.00). CSHNX (2500) and RMLPX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.87 vs. CSHNX (-0.37). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 205.20 vs. CSHNX (166.17).
| CSHNX | RMLPX | CSHNX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.10 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.10 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.643 | 8.350 | 68% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 1.28B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.43 | 4.76 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.37 | 12.87 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.85 | 68.73 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 166.17 | 205.20 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement