Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPZX
CSHNX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPZX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and PRPZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. PRPZX (519M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPZX (49.25) vs CSHNX (6.64). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPZX (12 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPZX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.35 vs. PRPZX (17.26). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 245.02 vs. PRPZX (204.44).
| CSHNX | PRPZX | CSHNX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.575 | 8.064 | 69% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 519M | 214% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.64 | 49.25 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.35 | 17.26 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.42 | 75.37 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 245.02 | 204.44 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.09 | 124.42 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement