Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPZX
CSHNX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and PRPZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. PRPZX (504M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPZX (10.95) vs CSHNX (6.43). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: CSHNX (12 years) vs PRPZX (12 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPZX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). PRPZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.24 vs. CSHNX (0.69). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 171.13 vs. PRPZX (134.36).
| CSHNX | PRPZX | CSHNX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.944 | 7.679 | 103% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 504M | 221% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.43 | 10.95 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.69 | 1.24 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.38 | 54.87 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.13 | 134.36 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.16 | 162.49 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement