Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPZX
CSHNX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPZX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and PRPZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. PRPZX (517M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPZX (51.02) vs CSHNX (6.79). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPZX (12 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPZX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.90 vs. PRPZX (22.82). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 180.78 vs. PRPZX (170.73).
| CSHNX | PRPZX | CSHNX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.662 | 4.953 | 74% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 517M | 214% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.79 | 51.02 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.90 | 22.82 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.49 | 62.33 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 180.78 | 170.73 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.87 | 40.44 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement