Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPZX
CSHNX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPZX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and PRPZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. PRPZX (511M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPZX (49.29) vs CSHNX (6.57). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPZX (12 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPZX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.75 vs. PRPZX (15.77). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 191.50 vs. PRPZX (172.17).
| CSHNX | PRPZX | CSHNX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.146 | 4.296 | 73% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 511M | 215% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.57 | 49.29 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.75 | 15.77 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.29 | 68.45 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 191.50 | 172.17 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.63 | 46.18 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement