Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPQX
CSHNX vs PRPQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPQX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and PRPQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. PRPQX (494M). PRPQX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPQX (10.95) vs CSHNX (6.43). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPQX: CSHNX (12 years) vs PRPQX (8 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than PRPQX (1.10). PRPQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPQX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). PRPQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.29 vs. CSHNX (0.69). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 171.13 vs. PRPQX (135.36).
| CSHNX | PRPQX | CSHNX / PRPQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.10 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.10 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.944 | 7.629 | 104% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 494M | 226% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.43 | 10.95 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.69 | 1.29 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.38 | 55.09 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.13 | 135.36 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement