Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPQX
CSHNX vs PRPQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPQX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and PRPQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. PRPQX (484M). PRPQX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPQX (57.12) vs CSHNX (6.76). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPQX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPQX (8 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than PRPQX (1.10). PRPQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPQX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.32 vs. PRPQX (-5.29). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 172.19 vs. PRPQX (123.46).
| CSHNX | PRPQX | CSHNX / PRPQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.10 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.10 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.547 | 0.128 | 2,770% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 484M | 219% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.76 | 57.12 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.32 | -5.29 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.82 | 41.59 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 172.19 | 123.46 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement