Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPCX
CSHNX vs PRPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and PRPCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. PRPCX (490M). PRPCX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPCX (65.50) vs CSHNX (7.05). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPCX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPCX (12 years). PRPCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). PRPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPCX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.44 vs. PRPCX (0.94). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 207.40 vs. PRPCX (149.71).
| CSHNX | PRPCX | CSHNX / PRPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.20 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.20 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.326 | 3.245 | 41% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 490M | 211% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 65.50 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.44 | 0.94 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.41 | 42.84 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 207.40 | 149.71 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.81 | 75.31 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement