Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPCX
CSHNX vs PRPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPCX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and PRPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. PRPCX (484M). PRPCX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPCX (74.65) vs CSHNX (6.76). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPCX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPCX (12 years). PRPCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). PRPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPCX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.32 vs. PRPCX (-8.29). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 172.19 vs. PRPCX (105.44).
| CSHNX | PRPCX | CSHNX / PRPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.20 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.20 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.547 | -2.753 | -129% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 484M | 219% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.76 | 74.65 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.32 | -8.29 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.82 | 34.13 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 172.19 | 105.44 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.85 | 92.94 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement