Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPCX
CSHNX vs PRPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a StrongBuy and PRPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. PRPCX (467M). PRPCX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPCX (74.65) vs CSHNX (6.76). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPCX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPCX (12 years). PRPCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). PRPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPCX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.21 vs. PRPCX (-3.79). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 181.36 vs. PRPCX (115.24).
| CSHNX | PRPCX | CSHNX / PRPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.20 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.20 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.714 | -3.396 | -80% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 467M | 224% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.76 | 74.65 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.21 | -3.79 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.58 | 40.25 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 181.36 | 115.24 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.80 | 85.74 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement