Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPAX
CSHNX vs PRPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and PRPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. PRPAX (484M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPAX (61.26) vs CSHNX (6.76). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPAX (12 years). PRPAX (1.51) and CSHNX (1.49) have similar cost to investors . PRPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.80 vs. PRPAX (-5.52). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 182.82 vs. PRPAX (126.22).
| CSHNX | PRPAX | CSHNX / PRPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.46 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.51 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.917 | -0.456 | -860% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 484M | 219% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.76 | 61.26 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.80 | -5.52 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.39 | 39.69 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 182.82 | 126.22 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.55 | 112.98 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement