Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPAX
CSHNX vs PRPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and PRPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. PRPAX (490M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPAX (54.44) vs CSHNX (7.05). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPAX (12 years). PRPAX (1.51) and CSHNX (1.49) have similar cost to investors . PRPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). PRPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.54 vs. CSHNX (1.65). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 209.37 vs. PRPAX (163.12).
| CSHNX | PRPAX | CSHNX / PRPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.46 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.51 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.974 | 4.868 | 41% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 490M | 211% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 54.44 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.65 | 2.54 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.69 | 47.58 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 209.37 | 163.12 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.71 | 99.34 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement