Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPAX
CSHNX vs PRPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and PRPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. PRPAX (463M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPAX (12.25) vs CSHNX (6.84). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPAX: CSHNX (12 years) vs PRPAX (12 years). PRPAX (1.51) and CSHNX (1.49) have similar cost to investors . PRPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). PRPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.32 vs. CSHNX (-6.76). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 144.24 vs. PRPAX (106.30).
| CSHNX | PRPAX | CSHNX / PRPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.46 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.51 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.621 | 1.077 | 150% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 463M | 228% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.84 | 12.25 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.76 | -6.32 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.13 | 42.62 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 144.24 | 106.30 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.70 | 143.59 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers