Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPAX
CSHNX vs PRPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and PRPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. PRPAX (502M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPAX (52.57) vs CSHNX (6.61). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPAX (12 years). PRPAX (1.51) and CSHNX (1.49) have similar cost to investors . PRPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.82 vs. PRPAX (15.19). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 171.90 vs. PRPAX (147.94).
| CSHNX | PRPAX | CSHNX / PRPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.46 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.51 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.990 | 3.980 | 50% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 502M | 216% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.61 | 52.57 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.82 | 15.19 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 48.24 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.90 | 147.94 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.16 | 54.87 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement