Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs MLXCX
CSHNX vs MLXCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. MLXCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and MLXCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. MLXCX (414M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than MLXCX: CSHNX (6.61) vs MLXCX (4.17). CSHNX was incepted earlier than MLXCX: CSHNX (11 years) vs MLXCX (11 years). MLXCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MLXCX (22.00). CSHNX (2500) and MLXCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.59 vs. MLXCX (16.86). MLXCX return over 5 years is better than : 185.93 vs. CSHNX (173.59).
| CSHNX | MLXCX | CSHNX / MLXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.43 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.48 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.627 | -1.569 | -167% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 414M | 262% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.61 | 4.17 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.59 | 16.86 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.33 | 52.23 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 173.59 | 185.93 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.20 | 51.42 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement