Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs MLXCX
CSHNX vs MLXCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. MLXCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and MLXCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. MLXCX (341M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than MLXCX: CSHNX (6.67) vs MLXCX (4.43). CSHNX was incepted earlier than MLXCX: CSHNX (11 years) vs MLXCX (11 years). MLXCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MLXCX (16.00). CSHNX (2500) and MLXCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.44 vs. MLXCX (-2.53). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 210.02 vs. MLXCX (194.25).
| CSHNX | MLXCX | CSHNX / MLXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.43 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.48 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.107 | -10.795 | 10% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 341M | 299% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.67 | 4.43 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | -2.53 | -214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.10 | 48.16 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 210.02 | 194.25 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.83 | 53.96 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers