Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs MLCPX
CSHNX vs MLCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. MLCPX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and MLCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. MLCPX (800M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than MLCPX: CSHNX (6.61) vs MLCPX (5.14). CSHNX was incepted earlier than MLCPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs MLCPX (11 years). MLCPX (12.21) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MLCPX (15.31). CSHNX (2500) and MLCPX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.82 vs. MLCPX (11.13). MLCPX return over 5 years is better than : 214.35 vs. CSHNX (171.90).
| CSHNX | MLCPX | CSHNX / MLCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 12.21 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 12.21 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.990 | 0.032 | 6,270% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 800M | 136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.61 | 5.14 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.82 | 11.13 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 63.14 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.90 | 214.35 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.16 | 50.96 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement