Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs IMLPX
CSHNX vs IMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. IMLPX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and IMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. IMLPX (797M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than IMLPX: CSHNX (6.64) vs IMLPX (4.35). CSHNX was incepted earlier than IMLPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs IMLPX (15 years). IMLPX (11.21) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. IMLPX (15.31). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than IMLPX: CSHNX (2500) vs IMLPX (1000000). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.15 vs. IMLPX (10.15). IMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 270.63 vs. CSHNX (205.35).
| CSHNX | IMLPX | CSHNX / IMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 11.21 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 11.21 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.732 | -0.086 | -2,012% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 797M | 134% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.64 | 4.35 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.15 | 10.15 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.56 | 64.15 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 205.35 | 270.63 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.96 | 82.49 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement