Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs IMLPX
CSHNX vs IMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. IMLPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and IMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. IMLPX (793M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than IMLPX: CSHNX (6.43) vs IMLPX (4.45). CSHNX was incepted earlier than IMLPX: CSHNX (12 years) vs IMLPX (15 years). IMLPX (11.21) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. IMLPX (15.31). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than IMLPX: CSHNX (2500) vs IMLPX (1000000). IMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.35 vs. CSHNX (0.69). IMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 219.71 vs. CSHNX (171.13).
| CSHNX | IMLPX | CSHNX / IMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 11.21 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 11.21 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.944 | 7.802 | 102% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 793M | 141% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.43 | 4.45 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.69 | 4.35 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.38 | 70.71 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.13 | 219.71 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.16 | 186.89 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement