Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs IMLPX
CSHNX vs IMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. IMLPX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and IMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. IMLPX (735M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than IMLPX: CSHNX (6.67) vs IMLPX (4.39). CSHNX was incepted earlier than IMLPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs IMLPX (15 years). IMLPX (11.21) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. IMLPX (15.31). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than IMLPX: CSHNX (2500) vs IMLPX (1000000). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.24 vs. IMLPX (3.69). IMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 274.90 vs. CSHNX (214.68).
| CSHNX | IMLPX | CSHNX / IMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 11.21 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 11.21 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.107 | -2.013 | 55% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 735M | 139% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.67 | 4.39 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.24 | 3.69 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.32 | 61.59 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 214.68 | 274.90 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.01 | 86.91 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement