Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs HMSIX
CSHNX vs HMSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSIX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and HMSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. HMSIX (72.4M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSIX (8.42) vs CSHNX (6.84). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSIX: CSHNX (12 years) vs HMSIX (12 years). HMSIX (1.54) and CSHNX (1.49) have similar cost to investors . CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. HMSIX (6.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSIX: CSHNX (2500) vs HMSIX (250000). HMSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.75 vs. CSHNX (-6.76). HMSIX return over 5 years is better than : 162.22 vs. CSHNX (144.24).
| CSHNX | HMSIX | CSHNX / HMSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.50 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.54 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.621 | 2.862 | 57% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 72.4M | 1,460% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.84 | 8.42 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.76 | -5.75 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.13 | 61.21 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 144.24 | 162.22 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.70 | 158.85 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement