Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs HMSIX
CSHNX vs HMSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSIX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a StrongBuy and HMSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. HMSIX (73.1M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSIX (8.17) vs CSHNX (6.76). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSIX: CSHNX (11 years) vs HMSIX (12 years). HMSIX (1.54) and CSHNX (1.49) have similar cost to investors . CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. HMSIX (6.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSIX: CSHNX (2500) vs HMSIX (250000). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.21 vs. HMSIX (-3.19). HMSIX (183.93) and CSHNX (181.36) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | HMSIX | CSHNX / HMSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.50 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.54 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.714 | -2.679 | -101% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 73.1M | 1,431% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.76 | 8.17 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.21 | -3.19 | -69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.58 | 64.22 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 181.36 | 183.93 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.80 | 106.94 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement