Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs HMSIX
CSHNX vs HMSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSIX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and HMSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. HMSIX (73.9M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSIX (7.81) vs CSHNX (6.43). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSIX: CSHNX (12 years) vs HMSIX (12 years). HMSIX (1.54) and CSHNX (1.49) have similar cost to investors . CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSIX: CSHNX (2500) vs HMSIX (250000). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.69 vs. HMSIX (-0.85). HMSIX return over 5 years is better than : 191.76 vs. CSHNX (171.13).
| CSHNX | HMSIX | CSHNX / HMSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.50 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.54 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.944 | 8.667 | 92% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 73.9M | 1,507% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.43 | 7.81 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.69 | -0.85 | -80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.38 | 69.12 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.13 | 191.76 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.16 | 171.22 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement