Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs HMSIX
CSHNX vs HMSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSIX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and HMSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. HMSIX (74.2M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSIX (8.17) vs CSHNX (6.76). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSIX: CSHNX (11 years) vs HMSIX (12 years). HMSIX (1.54) and CSHNX (1.49) have similar cost to investors . CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. HMSIX (6.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSIX: CSHNX (2500) vs HMSIX (250000). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.80 vs. HMSIX (-5.17). HMSIX (185.64) and CSHNX (182.82) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | HMSIX | CSHNX / HMSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.50 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.54 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.917 | -1.244 | -315% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 74.2M | 1,427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.76 | 8.17 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.80 | -5.17 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.39 | 58.94 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 182.82 | 185.64 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.55 | 123.86 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement