Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs HMSIX
CSHNX vs HMSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSIX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and HMSIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. HMSIX (71.8M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSIX (8.31) vs CSHNX (6.67). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSIX: CSHNX (11 years) vs HMSIX (12 years). HMSIX (1.54) and CSHNX (1.49) have similar cost to investors . CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. HMSIX (6.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSIX: CSHNX (2500) vs HMSIX (250000). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.44 vs. HMSIX (2.40). HMSIX return over 5 years is better than : 233.55 vs. CSHNX (210.02).
| CSHNX | HMSIX | CSHNX / HMSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.50 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.54 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.107 | -5.708 | 19% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 71.8M | 1,419% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.67 | 8.31 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 2.40 | 227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.10 | 64.44 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 210.02 | 233.55 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.83 | 74.18 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement