Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs HMSFX
CSHNX vs HMSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and HMSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. HMSFX (74.2M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSFX (8.62) vs CSHNX (6.76). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSFX: CSHNX (11 years) vs HMSFX (12 years). HMSFX (1.94) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). CSHNX (2500) and HMSFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.80 vs. HMSFX (-5.57). CSHNX (182.82) and HMSFX (181.48) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | HMSFX | CSHNX / HMSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.75 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.94 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.917 | -1.554 | -252% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 74.2M | 1,427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.76 | 8.62 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.80 | -5.57 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.39 | 57.61 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 182.82 | 181.48 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.55 | 118.20 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement