Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs HMSFX
CSHNX vs HMSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSFX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a StrongBuy and HMSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. HMSFX (73.1M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSFX (8.62) vs CSHNX (6.76). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSFX: CSHNX (11 years) vs HMSFX (12 years). HMSFX (1.94) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). CSHNX (2500) and HMSFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.21 vs. HMSFX (-3.60). CSHNX (181.36) and HMSFX (180.04) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | HMSFX | CSHNX / HMSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.75 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.94 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.714 | -3.063 | -89% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 73.1M | 1,431% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.76 | 8.62 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.21 | -3.60 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.58 | 62.82 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 181.36 | 180.04 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.80 | 101.49 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement