Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs HMSFX
CSHNX vs HMSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and HMSFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. HMSFX (77.1M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSFX (8.39) vs CSHNX (6.57). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSFX: CSHNX (11 years) vs HMSFX (12 years). HMSFX (1.94) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). CSHNX (2500) and HMSFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.97 vs. HMSFX (12.67). HMSFX return over 5 years is better than : 219.94 vs. CSHNX (187.86).
| CSHNX | HMSFX | CSHNX / HMSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.75 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.94 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.518 | -2.007 | -76% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 77.1M | 1,407% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.57 | 8.39 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.97 | 12.67 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.26 | 76.95 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 187.86 | 219.94 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.54 | 50.27 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement