Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs HMSFX
CSHNX vs HMSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSFX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and HMSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. HMSFX (72.4M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSFX (8.89) vs CSHNX (6.84). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSFX: CSHNX (12 years) vs HMSFX (12 years). HMSFX (1.94) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). CSHNX (2500) and HMSFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HMSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.91 vs. CSHNX (-7.53). HMSFX return over 5 years is better than : 158.02 vs. CSHNX (144.01).
| CSHNX | HMSFX | CSHNX / HMSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.75 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.94 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.525 | 2.591 | 59% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 72.4M | 1,460% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.84 | 8.89 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.53 | -6.91 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.98 | 59.32 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 144.01 | 158.02 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.50 | 151.61 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement