Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs HMSFX
CSHNX vs HMSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and HMSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. HMSFX (71.7M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSFX (8.77) vs CSHNX (6.67). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSFX: CSHNX (11 years) vs HMSFX (12 years). HMSFX (1.94) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). CSHNX (2500) and HMSFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.44 vs. HMSFX (1.99). HMSFX return over 5 years is better than : 229.14 vs. CSHNX (210.02).
| CSHNX | HMSFX | CSHNX / HMSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.75 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.94 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.107 | -5.998 | 18% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 71.7M | 1,421% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.67 | 8.77 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 1.99 | 274% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.10 | 63.00 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 210.02 | 229.14 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.83 | 69.75 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement