Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs GMNPX
CSHNX vs GMNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GMNPX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and GMNPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMNPX has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. CSHNX (1.02B). GMNPX (6.70) and CSHNX (6.67) have matching dividends . CSHNX was incepted earlier than GMNPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs GMNPX (8 years). GMNPX (6.62) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). GMNPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). GMNPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: GMNPX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.44 vs. GMNPX (4.61). GMNPX (214.17) and CSHNX (210.02) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | GMNPX | CSHNX / GMNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.62 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.62 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.107 | -0.916 | 121% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 1.55B | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.67 | 6.70 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 4.61 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.10 | 56.35 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 210.02 | 214.17 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement