Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs GMLPX
CSHNX vs GMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GMLPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and GMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.67B vs. CSHNX (1.11B). GMLPX (6.44) and CSHNX (6.43) have matching dividends . CSHNX was incepted earlier than GMLPX: CSHNX (12 years) vs GMLPX (13 years). GMLPX (6.63) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). GMLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMLPX: CSHNX (2500) vs GMLPX (1000000). GMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.97 vs. CSHNX (0.69). GMLPX (172.63) and CSHNX (171.13) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | GMLPX | CSHNX / GMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.63 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.63 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.944 | 6.875 | 116% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 1.67B | 67% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.43 | 6.44 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.69 | 1.97 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.38 | 60.65 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.13 | 172.63 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.16 | 140.62 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement