Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs GLPRX
CSHNX vs GLPRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GLPRX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and GLPRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPRX has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. CSHNX (1.02B). GLPRX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: GLPRX (7.64) vs CSHNX (6.67). CSHNX was incepted earlier than GLPRX: CSHNX (11 years) vs GLPRX (13 years). GLPRX (7.24) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). GLPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). GLPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: GLPRX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.44 vs. GLPRX (3.95). CSHNX (210.02) and GLPRX (204.09) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | GLPRX | CSHNX / GLPRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 7.24 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 7.24 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.107 | -1.423 | 78% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 1.55B | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.67 | 7.64 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 3.95 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.10 | 53.43 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 210.02 | 204.09 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.83 | 51.03 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement