Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs GLPRX
CSHNX vs GLPRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GLPRX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and GLPRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPRX has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. CSHNX (1.11B). GLPRX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: GLPRX (7.33) vs CSHNX (6.43). CSHNX was incepted earlier than GLPRX: CSHNX (12 years) vs GLPRX (13 years). GLPRX (7.24) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). GLPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). GLPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: GLPRX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). GLPRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.10 vs. CSHNX (0.69). CSHNX (171.13) and GLPRX (163.77) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | GLPRX | CSHNX / GLPRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 7.24 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 7.24 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.944 | 6.829 | 116% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 1.65B | 68% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.43 | 7.33 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.69 | 1.10 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.38 | 57.33 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.13 | 163.77 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.16 | 124.94 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement