Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs GLPAX
CSHNX vs GLPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GLPAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and GLPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPAX has more cash in the bank: 1.58B vs. CSHNX (1.04B). GLPAX (7.38) and CSHNX (7.05) have matching dividends . CSHNX was incepted earlier than GLPAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs GLPAX (13 years). GLPAX (6.99) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). GLPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). GLPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: GLPAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). GLPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.14 vs. CSHNX (1.44). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 207.40 vs. GLPAX (194.87).
| CSHNX | GLPAX | CSHNX / GLPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.99 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.99 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.326 | 1.999 | 66% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 1.58B | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 7.38 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.44 | 4.14 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.41 | 50.48 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 207.40 | 194.87 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.81 | 72.21 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement