Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs GLPAX
CSHNX vs GLPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GLPAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and GLPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPAX has more cash in the bank: 1.66B vs. CSHNX (1.1B). GLPAX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: GLPAX (6.93) vs CSHNX (6.57). CSHNX was incepted earlier than GLPAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs GLPAX (12 years). GLPAX (6.99) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). GLPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). GLPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: GLPAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.75 vs. GLPAX (11.05). GLPAX (200.08) and CSHNX (191.50) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | GLPAX | CSHNX / GLPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.99 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.99 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.146 | 3.546 | 89% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 1.66B | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.57 | 6.93 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.75 | 11.05 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.29 | 82.05 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 191.50 | 200.08 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.63 | 33.17 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement