Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs GLPAX
CSHNX vs GLPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GLPAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and GLPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPAX has more cash in the bank: 1.67B vs. CSHNX (1.11B). GLPAX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: GLPAX (6.96) vs CSHNX (6.43). CSHNX was incepted earlier than GLPAX: CSHNX (12 years) vs GLPAX (13 years). GLPAX (6.99) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). GLPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). GLPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: GLPAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). GLPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.45 vs. CSHNX (0.69). CSHNX (171.13) and GLPAX (167.32) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | GLPAX | CSHNX / GLPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.99 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.99 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.944 | 6.831 | 116% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 1.67B | 67% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.43 | 6.96 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.69 | 1.45 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.38 | 58.68 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.13 | 167.32 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.16 | 130.81 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement