Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs GLERX
CSHNX vs GLERX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GLERX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and GLERX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. GLERX (443M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than GLERX: CSHNX (6.76) vs GLERX (2.76). CSHNX was incepted earlier than GLERX: CSHNX (11 years) vs GLERX (8 years). GLERX (1.79) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). GLERX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). GLERX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: GLERX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.32 vs. GLERX (-10.82). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 172.19 vs. GLERX (105.73).
| CSHNX | GLERX | CSHNX / GLERX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.73 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.79 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.547 | 3.242 | 109% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 443M | 239% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.76 | 2.76 | 245% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.32 | -10.82 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.82 | 29.42 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 172.19 | 105.73 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement