Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs EIPFX
CSHNX vs EIPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. EIPFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and EIPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. EIPFX (82.6M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than EIPFX: CSHNX (6.43) vs EIPFX (2.44). CSHNX was incepted earlier than EIPFX: CSHNX (12 years) vs EIPFX (9 years). EIPFX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). EIPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX (2500) and EIPFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EIPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.67 vs. CSHNX (0.69). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 171.13 vs. EIPFX (58.16).
| CSHNX | EIPFX | CSHNX / EIPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.66 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.13 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.944 | 8.511 | 93% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 82.6M | 1,349% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.43 | 2.44 | 263% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.69 | 2.67 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.38 | 34.29 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.13 | 58.16 | 294% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement