Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs EGLAX
CSHNX vs EGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. EGLAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and EGLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. EGLAX (209M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than EGLAX: CSHNX (7.05) vs EGLAX (5.05). CSHNX was incepted earlier than EGLAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs EGLAX (13 years). EGLAX (1.92) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). EGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). EGLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). CSHNX (2500) and EGLAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EGLAX (1.50) and CSHNX (1.44) have marching annual gain over last year. EGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 261.40 vs. CSHNX (207.40).
| CSHNX | EGLAX | CSHNX / EGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.65 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.92 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.326 | 0.431 | 308% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 87% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 209M | 496% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 5.05 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.44 | 1.50 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.41 | 61.43 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 207.40 | 261.40 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.81 | 125.94 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement