Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs EGLAX
CSHNX vs EGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. EGLAX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and EGLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. EGLAX (225M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than EGLAX: CSHNX (6.64) vs EGLAX (4.46). CSHNX was incepted earlier than EGLAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs EGLAX (13 years). EGLAX (2.06) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). EGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). EGLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). CSHNX (2500) and EGLAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX (15.79) and EGLAX (15.61) have marching annual gain over last year. EGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 282.25 vs. CSHNX (205.68).
| CSHNX | EGLAX | CSHNX / EGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.66 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.06 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.287 | 3.120 | 105% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 87% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 225M | 485% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.64 | 4.46 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.79 | 15.61 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.13 | 79.32 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 205.68 | 282.25 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.82 | 95.03 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement