Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHCX vs SMRPX
CSHCX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHCX vs. SMRPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHCX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. CSHCX (1.11B). CSHCX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: CSHCX (8.56) vs SMRPX (4.22). CSHCX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: CSHCX (15 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). CSHCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. CSHCX (25.00). CSHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: CSHCX (2500) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. CSHCX (-1.99). CSHCX return over 5 years is better than : 156.16 vs. SMRPX (135.35).
| CSHCX | SMRPX | CSHCX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.02 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.05 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.894 | 8.317 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 1.31B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.56 | 4.22 | 203% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.99 | 7.66 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.49 | 70.88 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 156.16 | 135.35 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.30 | 213.70 | 48% |