Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHCX vs SMFPX
CSHCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHCX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. CSHCX (1.11B). CSHCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHCX (8.85) vs SMFPX (3.50). CSHCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHCX (15 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). CSHCX (2.24) and SMFPX (2.15) have similar cost to investors . SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CSHCX (25.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHCX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHCX (2500). CSHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.04 vs. SMFPX (23.39). CSHCX return over 5 years is better than : 167.49 vs. SMFPX (147.28).
| CSHCX | SMFPX | CSHCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 2.12 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 2.15 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.248 | 3.588 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 1.29B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.85 | 3.50 | 253% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.04 | 23.39 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.71 | 63.75 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 167.49 | 147.28 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.50 | 26.62 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement