Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHCX vs SMFPX
CSHCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHCX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. CSHCX (1.11B). CSHCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHCX (8.56) vs SMFPX (3.19). CSHCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHCX (15 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). CSHCX (2.24) and SMFPX (2.15) have similar cost to investors . SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. CSHCX (25.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHCX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHCX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. CSHCX (-1.99). CSHCX return over 5 years is better than : 156.16 vs. SMFPX (123.81).
| CSHCX | SMFPX | CSHCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 2.12 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 2.15 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.894 | 8.213 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 1.29B | 87% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.56 | 3.19 | 268% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.99 | 6.78 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.49 | 66.05 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 156.16 | 123.81 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.30 | 182.43 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement