Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHCX vs RMLPX
CSHCX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHCX vs. RMLPX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHCX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. CSHCX (1.08B). CSHCX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: CSHCX (8.73) vs RMLPX (5.04). CSHCX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: CSHCX (15 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). CSHCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). CSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). CSHCX (2500) and RMLPX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.06 vs. RMLPX (9.14). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 240.79 vs. CSHCX (189.83).
| CSHCX | RMLPX | CSHCX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.10 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.10 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.923 | 5.709 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 1.18B | 92% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.73 | 5.04 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.06 | 9.14 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.07 | 61.16 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 189.83 | 240.79 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement