Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHCX vs RMLPX
CSHCX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHCX vs. RMLPX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHCX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. CSHCX (1.02B). CSHCX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: CSHCX (8.77) vs RMLPX (5.02). CSHCX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: CSHCX (15 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). CSHCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). CSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). CSHCX (2500) and RMLPX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.70 vs. RMLPX (3.11). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 267.58 vs. CSHCX (198.03).
| CSHCX | RMLPX | CSHCX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.10 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.10 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.665 | 4.196 | -40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 1.16B | 88% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.77 | 5.02 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.70 | 3.11 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.59 | 59.74 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 198.03 | 267.58 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement