Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHCX vs MLPFX
CSHCX vs MLPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHCX vs. MLPFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHCX is a Hold and MLPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPFX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. CSHCX (1.02B). CSHCX pays higher dividends than MLPFX: CSHCX (8.77) vs MLPFX (6.03). CSHCX was incepted earlier than MLPFX: CSHCX (15 years) vs MLPFX (16 years). MLPFX (10.29) is less costly to investors than CSHCX (2.24). CSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MLPFX (20.00). MLPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHCX: MLPFX (1000) vs CSHCX (2500). MLPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.86 vs. CSHCX (4.70). MLPFX return over 5 years is better than : 238.16 vs. CSHCX (198.03).
| CSHCX | MLPFX | CSHCX / MLPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 10.29 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 10.29 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.665 | 1.594 | -104% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 1.94B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.77 | 6.03 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.70 | 7.86 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.59 | 69.41 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 198.03 | 238.16 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.83 | 88.38 | 31% |