Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHCX vs MLPFX
CSHCX vs MLPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHCX vs. MLPFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHCX is a Hold and MLPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPFX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. CSHCX (1.05B). CSHCX pays higher dividends than MLPFX: CSHCX (9.06) vs MLPFX (6.11). CSHCX was incepted earlier than MLPFX: CSHCX (15 years) vs MLPFX (16 years). MLPFX (10.29) is less costly to investors than CSHCX (2.24). CSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MLPFX (20.00). MLPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHCX: MLPFX (1000) vs CSHCX (2500). MLPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.35 vs. CSHCX (-7.94). MLPFX return over 5 years is better than : 169.14 vs. CSHCX (126.28).
| CSHCX | MLPFX | CSHCX / MLPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 10.29 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 10.29 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.772 | 2.414 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 2.06B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.06 | 6.11 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.94 | 6.35 | -125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.43 | 68.80 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 126.28 | 169.14 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.32 | 189.75 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement