Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHAX vs SMRPX
CSHAX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHAX vs. SMRPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHAX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. CSHAX (1.09B). CSHAX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: CSHAX (6.46) vs SMRPX (4.22). CSHAX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: CSHAX (15 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). CSHAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. CSHAX (25.00). CSHAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: CSHAX (15000) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. CSHAX (0.60). CSHAX return over 5 years is better than : 171.26 vs. SMRPX (135.35).
| CSHAX | SMRPX | CSHAX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.02 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.05 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.974 | 8.317 | 96% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 1000000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 1.31B | 83% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.46 | 4.22 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.60 | 7.66 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.27 | 70.88 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.26 | 135.35 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.60 | 213.70 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement