Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHAX vs SMFPX
CSHAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHAX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. CSHAX (1.11B). CSHAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHAX (6.80) vs SMFPX (3.50). CSHAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHAX (15 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than CSHAX (1.50). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CSHAX (25.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHAX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHAX (15000). CSHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.99 vs. SMFPX (23.39). CSHAX return over 5 years is better than : 180.74 vs. SMFPX (147.28).
| CSHAX | SMFPX | CSHAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 2.12 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 2.15 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.674 | 3.588 | 102% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 1000 | 1,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 1.29B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.80 | 3.50 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.99 | 23.39 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.57 | 63.75 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 180.74 | 147.28 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.67 | 26.62 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement