Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHAX vs SMFPX
CSHAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. CSHAX (1.09B). CSHAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHAX (6.46) vs SMFPX (3.19). CSHAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHAX (15 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than CSHAX (1.50). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. CSHAX (25.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHAX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHAX (15000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. CSHAX (0.60). CSHAX return over 5 years is better than : 171.26 vs. SMFPX (123.81).
| CSHAX | SMFPX | CSHAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 2.12 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 2.15 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.974 | 8.213 | 97% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 1000 | 1,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 1.29B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.46 | 3.19 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.60 | 6.78 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.27 | 66.05 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.26 | 123.81 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.60 | 182.43 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement