Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHAX vs RMLPX
CSHAX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHAX vs. RMLPX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHAX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. CSHAX (1.06B). CSHAX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: CSHAX (6.78) vs RMLPX (4.94). CSHAX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: CSHAX (15 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). CSHAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). CSHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). RMLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHAX: RMLPX (2500) vs CSHAX (15000). RMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.55 vs. CSHAX (-1.32). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 202.53 vs. CSHAX (172.14).
| CSHAX | RMLPX | CSHAX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.10 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.10 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.558 | 11.568 | 31% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 1.2B | 88% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.78 | 4.94 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.32 | 2.55 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.84 | 58.70 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 172.14 | 202.53 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement