Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHAX vs RMLPX
CSHAX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHAX vs. RMLPX commentary
Feb 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHAX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. CSHAX (1.09B). CSHAX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: CSHAX (6.46) vs RMLPX (4.76). CSHAX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: CSHAX (15 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). CSHAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). CSHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMLPX (12.00). RMLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHAX: RMLPX (2500) vs CSHAX (15000). RMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.87 vs. CSHAX (-0.37). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 205.20 vs. CSHAX (166.11).
| CSHAX | RMLPX | CSHAX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.10 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.10 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.761 | 8.350 | 69% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 1.28B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.46 | 4.76 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.37 | 12.87 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.88 | 68.73 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 166.11 | 205.20 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement