Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHAX vs MLPFX
CSHAX vs MLPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHAX vs. MLPFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHAX is a Hold and MLPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPFX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. CSHAX (1.02B). CSHAX pays higher dividends than MLPFX: CSHAX (6.68) vs MLPFX (6.03). CSHAX was incepted earlier than MLPFX: CSHAX (15 years) vs MLPFX (16 years). MLPFX (10.29) is less costly to investors than CSHAX (1.50). CSHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MLPFX (20.00). CSHAX (6%) and MLPFX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MLPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHAX: MLPFX (1000) vs CSHAX (15000). MLPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.86 vs. CSHAX (5.45). MLPFX return over 5 years is better than : 238.16 vs. CSHAX (210.01).
| CSHAX | MLPFX | CSHAX / MLPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 10.29 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 10.29 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.109 | 1.594 | -70% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 1000 | 1,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 1.94B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.68 | 6.03 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.45 | 7.86 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.94 | 69.41 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 210.01 | 238.16 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.49 | 88.38 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement