Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSGZX vs SLMCX
CSGZX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts CSGZX vs SLMCX
Columbia Seligman Global Tech Inst
Price$104.13
Change+$4.89 (+4.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.43B
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info A
Price$172.98
Change+$8.12 (+4.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.49B
CSGZX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSGZX vs. SLMCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGZX is a Hold and SLMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 20.5B vs. CSGZX (3.43B). CSGZX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CSGZX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: CSGZX (15 years) vs SLMCX (43 years). SLMCX (1.16) is less costly to investors than CSGZX (1.04). SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. CSGZX (25.00). CSGZX (2000) and SLMCX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SLMCX (36.44) and CSGZX (34.73) have marching annual gain over last year. CSGZX return over 5 years is better than : 58.25 vs. SLMCX (51.76).
| CSGZX | SLMCX | CSGZX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.16 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.16 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.599 | 10.389 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.43B | 20.5B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.73 | 36.44 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.63 | 82.72 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.25 | 51.76 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 300.25 | 257.77 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers