Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSGTX vs WCMNX
CSGTX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts CSGTX vs WCMNX
Transamerica Small Cap Growth C
Price$4.23
Change+$0.04 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.82M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.85
Change+$0.20 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
CSGTX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSGTX vs. WCMNX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGTX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSGTX has more cash in the bank: 81.8M vs. WCMNX (44.4M). CSGTX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . CSGTX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: CSGTX (13 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). CSGTX (2.26) is less costly to investors than WCMNX (2.04). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. CSGTX (47.00). CSGTX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.65 vs. CSGTX (-22.95). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.44 vs. CSGTX (-36.58).
| CSGTX | WCMNX | CSGTX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 1.24 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 2.04 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.628 | 9.141 | -18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.8M | 44.4M | 184% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.95 | 0.65 | -3,509% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.50 | 22.89 | -59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.58 | 0.44 | -8,408% |
| Returns for 10 years | -66.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement