Advertisement
CSGS vs QTWO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGS is a Hold and QTWO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSGS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CSGS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSGS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- QTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CSGS (@Computer Communications) experienced а +0.08% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.11%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSGS is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.
QTWO is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+0.13% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (-1.63% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CSGS | QTWO | CSGS / QTWO | |
| Capitalization | 2.27B | 4.3B | 53% |
| EBITDA | 211M | 98.1M | 215% |
| Gain YTD | 3.612 | -4.684 | -77% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.04 | 137.56 | 20% |
| Revenue | 1.22B | 770M | 158% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 569M | - |
| Total Debt | 566M | 539M | 105% |
CSGS | QTWO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 6 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CSGS's Valuation (17) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (82) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
CSGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew significantly faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
CSGS's SMR Rating (33) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (84) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
CSGS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (63) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
CSGS's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew significantly faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
| CSGS | QTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 57% | 21 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 54% | 1 day ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 1 day ago 70% |
Advertisement
CSGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSGS has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSGS jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSGS | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| FRSH - CSGS | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| QTWO - CSGS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| DOX - CSGS | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| RDVT - CSGS | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| SSNC - CSGS | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.45% | ||
More | ||||
QTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with ALKT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then ALKT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTWO | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| ALKT - QTWO | 68% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| COIN - QTWO | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| PCOR - QTWO | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| FRSH - QTWO | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| WEAV - QTWO | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.11% | ||
More | ||||