CSGP
Price
$68.23
Change
+$0.76 (+1.13%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
28.92B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MNGGF
Price
$0.76
Change
+$0.03 (+4.11%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
19.2M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSGP vs MNGGF

Header iconCSGP vs MNGGF Comparison
Open Charts CSGP vs MNGGFBanner chart's image
CoStar Group
Price$68.23
Change+$0.76 (+1.13%)
Volume$3.15M
Capitalization28.92B
Mongolia Growth Group
Price$0.76
Change+$0.03 (+4.11%)
Volume$6K
Capitalization19.2M
CSGP vs MNGGF Comparison Chart in %
CSGP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNGGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSGP vs. MNGGF commentary
Dec 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGP is a Hold and MNGGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CSGP: $67.47 vs. MNGGF: $0.73)
Brand notoriety: CSGP and MNGGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSGP: 86% vs. MNGGF: 353%
Market capitalization -- CSGP: $28.92B vs. MNGGF: $19.2M
CSGP [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $28.92B. MNGGF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $19.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSGP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNGGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSGP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNGGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CSGP and MNGGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSGP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNGGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSGP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MNGGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNGGF is a better buy in the short-term than CSGP.

Price Growth

CSGP (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -1.06% price change this week, while MNGGF (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSGP is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.91% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSGP($28.9B) has a higher market cap than MNGGF($19.2M). CSGP has higher P/E ratio than MNGGF: CSGP (1137.17) vs MNGGF (5.81). CSGP YTD gains are higher at: -5.755 vs. MNGGF (-14.603). CSGP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 140M vs. MNGGF (-7.7M). CSGP has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. MNGGF (35.8M). CSGP has higher revenues than MNGGF: CSGP (3.06B) vs MNGGF (2.24M).
CSGPMNGGFCSGP / MNGGF
Capitalization28.9B19.2M150,521%
EBITDA140M-7.7M-1,818%
Gain YTD-5.755-14.60339%
P/E Ratio1137.175.8119,563%
Revenue3.06B2.24M136,612%
Total Cash1.94B35.8M5,405%
Total Debt1.18BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSGP vs MNGGF: Fundamental Ratings
CSGP
MNGGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6333
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10060
SMR RATING
1..100
8996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6382
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
217
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNGGF's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as CSGP (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that MNGGF’s stock grew similarly to CSGP’s over the last 12 months.

MNGGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSGP (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that MNGGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSGP’s over the last 12 months.

CSGP's SMR Rating (89) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as MNGGF (96) in the null industry. This means that CSGP’s stock grew similarly to MNGGF’s over the last 12 months.

CSGP's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as MNGGF (82) in the null industry. This means that CSGP’s stock grew similarly to MNGGF’s over the last 12 months.

CSGP's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as MNGGF (17) in the null industry. This means that CSGP’s stock grew similarly to MNGGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSGPMNGGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSGP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNGGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IWX92.410.57
+0.62%
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
DBJP94.400.33
+0.35%
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
NOVP30.460.02
+0.05%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Nov
NBCE31.80N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF
FTXN28.94-0.26
-0.90%
First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF

CSGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSGP has been loosely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSGP jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSGP
1D Price
Change %
CSGP100%
-0.59%
CBRE - CSGP
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
JLL - CSGP
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
CWK - CSGP
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.30%
CIGI - CSGP
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
NMRK - CSGP
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
More

MNGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNGGF and IWGFF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNGGF and IWGFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNGGF
1D Price
Change %
MNGGF100%
N/A
IWGFF - MNGGF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
CSGP - MNGGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
IRS - MNGGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
PKTEF - MNGGF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NMEHF - MNGGF
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More