Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSGCX vs RLBGX
CSGCX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts CSGCX vs RLBGX
Calvert Balanced C
Price$45.54
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$37.84
Change+$0.23 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
CSGCX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSGCX vs. RLBGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGCX is a Buy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. CSGCX (1.43B). RLBGX pays higher dividends than CSGCX: RLBGX (2.09) vs CSGCX (0.64). CSGCX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: CSGCX (32 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). CSGCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). CSGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 153.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSGCX: RLBGX (250) vs CSGCX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.35 vs. CSGCX (7.29). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.80 vs. CSGCX (30.49).
| CSGCX | RLBGX | CSGCX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.25 | 664% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.25 | 664% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.423 | 11.633 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 259B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 2.09 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.29 | 10.35 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.77 | 41.14 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.49 | 41.80 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.36 | 78.87 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement