Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSGCX vs RLBGX
CSGCX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts CSGCX vs RLBGX
Calvert Balanced C
Price$46.95
Change+$0.03 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$39.90
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
CSGCX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSGCX vs. RLBGX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGCX is a Buy and RLBGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. CSGCX (1.5B). RLBGX pays higher dividends than CSGCX: RLBGX (1.98) vs CSGCX (0.60). CSGCX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: CSGCX (32 years) vs RLBGX (17 years). CSGCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). CSGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 153.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSGCX: RLBGX (250) vs CSGCX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.16 vs. CSGCX (4.52). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.93 vs. CSGCX (28.09).
| CSGCX | RLBGX | CSGCX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.25 | 664% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.25 | 664% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.938 | 17.483 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.98 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.52 | 10.16 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.75 | 42.22 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.09 | 40.93 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.45 | 79.05 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement