Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSGCX vs RLBFX
CSGCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CSGCX vs RLBFX
Calvert Balanced C
Price$46.95
Change+$0.03 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.94
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
CSGCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSGCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. CSGCX (1.5B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CSGCX: RLBFX (1.93) vs CSGCX (0.60). CSGCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CSGCX (32 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). CSGCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). CSGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 153.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSGCX: RLBFX (250) vs CSGCX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.09 vs. CSGCX (4.52). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.63 vs. CSGCX (28.09).
| CSGCX | RLBFX | CSGCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.29 | 572% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.29 | 572% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.938 | 17.418 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.93 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.52 | 10.09 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.75 | 42.02 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.09 | 40.63 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.45 | 78.60 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement