Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs TIRGX
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TIRGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.94
Change+$1.08 (+1.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
T. Rowe Price Global Real Estate I
Price$18.01
Change+$0.65 (+3.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.38M
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TIRGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and TIRGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. TIRGX (64.4M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TIRGX: CSFZX (3.42) vs TIRGX (2.54). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TIRGX: CSFZX (11 years) vs TIRGX (9 years). TIRGX (1.21) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TIRGX (31.90). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TIRGX: CSFZX (0) vs TIRGX (500000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.74 vs. TIRGX (7.53). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 19.32 vs. TIRGX (4.88).
| CSFZX | TIRGX | CSFZX / TIRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.73 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.21 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.548 | 2.621 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 64.4M | 3,179% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.42 | 2.54 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.74 | 7.53 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.59 | 10.77 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.32 | 4.88 | 396% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement