Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs TIRGX
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TIRGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.31
Change+$0.16 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
T. Rowe Price Global Real Estate I
Price$17.27
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.01M
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TIRGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a StrongBuy and TIRGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. TIRGX (65M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TIRGX: CSFZX (2.93) vs TIRGX (2.52). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TIRGX: CSFZX (11 years) vs TIRGX (9 years). TIRGX (1.21) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TIRGX (31.90). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TIRGX: CSFZX (0) vs TIRGX (500000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.69 vs. TIRGX (-0.31). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 28.17 vs. TIRGX (10.33).
| CSFZX | TIRGX | CSFZX / TIRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.73 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.21 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.129 | 3.021 | 269% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 65M | 3,048% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 2.52 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.69 | -0.31 | -1,204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.36 | -3.45 | -98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.17 | 10.33 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.68 | N/A | - |