Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs TIRGX
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TIRGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.65
Change-$0.15 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
T. Rowe Price Global Real Estate I
Price$17.31
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.9M
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TIRGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and TIRGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.01B vs. TIRGX (65.9M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TIRGX: CSFZX (2.89) vs TIRGX (2.49). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TIRGX: CSFZX (11 years) vs TIRGX (9 years). TIRGX (1.21) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TIRGX (31.90). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TIRGX: CSFZX (0) vs TIRGX (500000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.08 vs. TIRGX (4.51). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 36.16 vs. TIRGX (14.42).
| CSFZX | TIRGX | CSFZX / TIRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.73 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.21 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.806 | 3.259 | 270% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 65.9M | 3,046% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 2.49 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.08 | 4.51 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.40 | 3.22 | 323% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.16 | 14.42 | 251% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement