Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs TIRGX
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TIRGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.69
Change+$0.31 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
T. Rowe Price Global Real Estate I
Price$17.47
Change+$0.13 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.44M
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TIRGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a StrongBuy and TIRGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. TIRGX (66.4M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TIRGX: CSFZX (2.82) vs TIRGX (2.43). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TIRGX: CSFZX (11 years) vs TIRGX (9 years). TIRGX (1.21) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TIRGX (31.90). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TIRGX: CSFZX (0) vs TIRGX (500000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.40 vs. TIRGX (-1.70). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 28.39 vs. TIRGX (10.93).
| CSFZX | TIRGX | CSFZX / TIRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.73 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.21 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.961 | 5.347 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 66.4M | 2,983% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.82 | 2.43 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.40 | -1.70 | -83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.39 | 8.16 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.39 | 10.93 | 260% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.11 | N/A | - |