Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs TIRGX
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TIRGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.12B
T. Rowe Price Global Real Estate I
Price$17.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.88M
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TIRGX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and TIRGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.12B vs. TIRGX (64.9M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TIRGX: CSFZX (2.77) vs TIRGX (2.41). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TIRGX: CSFZX (11 years) vs TIRGX (9 years). TIRGX (1.21) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TIRGX (31.90). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TIRGX: CSFZX (0) vs TIRGX (500000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. TIRGX (5.09). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 17.52 vs. TIRGX (5.02).
| CSFZX | TIRGX | CSFZX / TIRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.73 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.21 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.886 | 5.894 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.12B | 64.9M | 3,260% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 2.41 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | 5.09 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.11 | 20.31 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.52 | 5.02 | 349% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement